Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Electrinium

Started by singerxyz, September 02, 2008, 05:41:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

nitinnun

i need to know what frequency each element emits.

specifically the frequencies of copper, iron, cobalt, nickel, bismuth, lead, carbon, oxygen, and silicon.


it is very important.

Drannom

Hi Nitinnun !

i think you are right to use iron-copper cause

from electrinium

QuoteBut if Iron was paired up with a much lighter element, then the Iron would be the positive.


when he says ''lighter'' he was talking about the lighter density, in fact that is not density at all, cause he multiply weight by volume !!!


i can not provide you the frequency of each metal, i can only repeat that you need to calculate the volume of the atom or molecule, and then multiply it by the weight, so from my point of view you need the density of iron and compare it to the density of copper, cause that is the difference that gives the potential, i suspect copper to be less in electrical charge than iron

we know all the weights, then we need to calculate the atomic volume !

(weight x volume) does not equal to the density, but something else ! the electrical charge !

when i was talking about difference in frequency i was not refering to electrinium, i was refering to your theory, now i think that if fact, the same rule of electrical charge (weight x volume) shall be apply to your theory



welll in conclusion, i was wrong talking about density, sorry
Master in alum pyramid growing crystals at http://youtube.com/user/Cristallerie

nievesoliveras

Hi!

@all
For the time being I am just the observer.

Jesus

nievesoliveras


gyulasun

Hello Folks,

Sorry to chime into this thread but I have seen an interesting patent application mentioned in Naudin's yahoo group and maybe it is of interest for you too.  It is US patent application 20080246366:

ELECTRIC GENERATOR

Abstract
Methods, compositions, and apparatus for generating electricity are provided.
Electricity is generated through the mechanisms nuclear magnetic spin and
remnant polarization electric generation. The apparatus may include a material
with high nuclear magnetic spin or high remnant polarization coupled with a
poled ferroelectric material. The apparatus may also include a pair of
electrical contacts disposed on opposite sides of the poled ferroelectric
material and the high nuclear magnetic spin or high remnant polarization
material. Further, a magnetic field may be applied to the high nuclear magnetic
spin material.

You can download from here: http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat20080246366.pdf

All the Bests, 
Gyula