Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Towards Realizing the TPU

Started by poynt99, September 03, 2008, 08:46:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mannix




Hi all

You will have to run the sim to see what happens..its not supposed to be an overunity circuit ...they dont exist ! Its just a little circuit that runs in the simulator to portray a turbine. There is nothing special about any of the values.

The Transistors should be replaced with tubes....tubes just wont simulate so i used transistors to show it but I hope that some of you get the idea of an electronic  turbine spinning up from this. I would hope that some of you might  perfect this...even get tubes running on the sim....I couldnt but Im no expert at Multisim.

You have all heard the warnings

what are the limiting factors to the rpm of this thing ?

Please just run the sim and muck around with the values, Each transformer is a collector/control combination.

but just imagine those coils configured in a ring so that they interact with each other any way you think will work....


What if they run at different rates...have we 3 cannons?

Perhaps it's  worth a real build to see if anything different happens. I find it very interesting at least and I hope that it will help us learn  something useful to  pass  on to each other .

Any way its .. a good starting point and I think it asks some pretty good questions of us .And you can stay at the computer if you like ...just dont expect a simulator to show anything but the timings and how the coils interact with each other at lower  speeds.



this is  like professor seike's stuff  check him out ,and jln labs gstrain device


Lindsay



forest

Quote from: wattsup on January 27, 2009, 04:09:45 PM
@sparks

Regarding the FTPU outer rings (2), now if we supposed that each ring is made of insulated iron wire that is one length turned three times and connected end to end to make a mobius type loop. Now, let's say you have one coil wound all around the loop that we would call the secondary. Then you have one coil wound over just 1/3 of the loop called the primary. 

We already know that in standard laminated core coupling, the flux moves in the laminations relative to the primary polarities then to the secondary and thus creates the transfer.

Now in this case, when the primary hits the insulated iron wire (equal to laminate core), since it is insulated and turning three times back onto itself, does this mean with one pulse on primary, the flux will make three turns inside the secondary wind.

This would be equal to what @grumpy showed in his recent document on toroid windings, having one primary over several toroids transfering to many secondaries. The idea behind having a three ring laminate is that if the primary is well timed to expend the least energy possible (most bang for the buck which can be done very easilly with Tesla Ozone Patent shorting method), there may be a cumulative effect over the secondaries and produce some OU.

I know some will say "there goes wattsup again with his standard thinking", but this would not be so standard if the flux can turn three times inside the secondary winding. We are always trying to push current inside a copper condutor to impart coupling to other copper wires when we already know the best way is to move the flux in a laminate and if this flux can turn and turn many times very fast, I think it should make some interesting results.

In any case, I will make one this week and test it.


Interesting idea.However.... In that case the bigger output from TPU the more iron core turns should be there and TPU should be much higher. I don't see that being a case for TPU according to SM videos. Rather different approximation seems true : more output power means higher TPU diameter.Anyway, very good idea.

carbonc_cc

Has anybody made a request for a Wiki site go along side with the discussions?
It would sure help with consuming all of this data...

sparks

    @wattsup

        You can look on this from a radio wave perspective also.   Any radio man knows in his antennae system how to use a standing wave ratio meter.   If you want to get the signal out there you don't want your waves stuck in the coax.   What if we intentionally create a standing wave field in a virtual piece of coax could this standing wave field turn into a rotating standing wave field?
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

forest

@sparks

Exactly my idea except stationary rotating waves. What is the difference ? I don't know ,but I know that Tesla generated stationary waves and electricity is like two electromagnetic curled waves propagating along wire : magnetic over the surface while electric inside.