Towards Realizing the TPU

[BEP]

I don't have a working TPU. This was an experiment I did back when there was an argument about PI. This is also another way I found to make a loop resonate at very low frequencies.
You can get two pulses for the price of one. The tubing should only output during the rise and fall of the winding.
Don't make the loop too short. I had best results with a 15 ft piece of 1/4 inch tubing.

[Grumpy]

When you do this:

All I'm saying is simulate the mag fields going through a single piece of wire. The fields aren't just outside the wire.

you can use a toroid or a ring or even two separated conductors to convert the energy into electricity.

Hazelton used a toroid.

SM used a ring (and maybe a toroid too)

Tesla used two separated conductors in his Radiant energy convertion devices (the solar ones) to charge capacitors.

[innovation_station]

here is 1 more pic of the otto test toroide jt config unit ...

it remains unfinished ... 

i will change the config some time when i get to it ..

probally use ..  3 mk2's high self inductance high freq ... and dump the kick high freq to

3 shift coils ...  wound on this ringggggg

ist

btw this is a self induceing coil .....   

[giantkiller]

@BEP,
As we lower the angle of the control winding we lower winding count. We get that back by using stranded wire.

Joseph Henry's first discovery was that the power of a magnet could be immensely strengthened by winding it with insulated wire. He was the first person to make a magnet that could lift thirty-five hundred pounds of weight. Joseph Henry showed the difference between "quantity" magnets composed of short lengths of wire connected in parallel and excited by a few large cells; and "intensity" magnets wound with a single long wire and excited by a battery composed of cells in series.

--giantkiller.

[BEP]

Sorry GK.

I've had pretty bad luck with my TPU work but while using stranded wire my luck was about as big as a single piece of fly dung.

Like someone said a bit earlier.... good for capacitance and noise. I think I know all the reasons why it should be the way to go...just hasn't done me any good.

I think @Otto mentioned earlier... use high voltage to drive the controls. Well, the same is true for my tubing experiment. Take the number of turns around the outside of the tubing. Use that number to divide the control coil voltage. That should be your output voltage - if you hit resonance of the tubing.

Then there is that trick... figure your tube resonance by dividing the number of turns by 2 (usually works out around 1.65). Use that number to divide your 'normal' tubing resonance. There is where you should find highest output from the tubing.
The math is a little more complicated if the CC is bifilar series opposing.

Got a bug today - feel like excrement. Might as well share in case I head into that vortex 

If it doesn't work for ya, sorry. Got some vacation time coming. Maybe I'll finally post something interesting.