Towards Realizing the TPU

[rensseak]

Nice amplifier setup, but it is just an electronic circuit.  Where in this do you expect to find any overunity and by what mechanism?

You do the simulation first before you ask and read what SM told us.

[Room3327]

Oh, Shut my mouth and do as told, so sorry. But someone should tell you that those are just transformers and no transformer is overunity.  It is also common knowledge that there is not more energy in a BEMF spike then the energy that went into creating it.  It is also a fact that rogue waves do not contain any more energy then the waves that went into creating it.  And if you are going to be daring enough to pump RF energy into basically, a transmitting coil with an attached recieving coil, you deserve to be burned and hurt.  Yea. I know the truth hurts!  And I will also add, as I was told by the NEC at one point," There is no configuration of PM magnets and transformer combinations that have ever been modeled (and they have modeled a lot) that ever showed any sign of overunity".

[pese]

Just in case some members do not have access to Multisim a screen shot is attached.

Thanks Lindsay. Take care.

nap

This cicuot shown very "unfortunatly"

Also nothin is say over the imepancie. and ration of the transformers. Even the biasing of the transitors (10 / 100kohm divider separated with  secondary of Transformer is not usual .  We will see the coming problems...
Gustav Pese

[wattsup]

@sparks

Regarding the FTPU outer rings (2), now if we supposed that each ring is made of insulated iron wire that is one length turned three times and connected end to end to make a mobius type loop. Now, let's say you have one coil wound all around the loop that we would call the secondary. Then you have one coil wound over just 1/3 of the loop called the primary. 

We already know that in standard laminated core coupling, the flux moves in the laminations relative to the primary polarities then to the secondary and thus creates the transfer.

Now in this case, when the primary hits the insulated iron wire (equal to laminate core), since it is insulated and turning three times back onto itself, does this mean with one pulse on primary, the flux will make three turns inside the secondary wind.

This would be equal to what @grumpy showed in his recent document on toroid windings, having one primary over several toroids transfering to many secondaries. The idea behind having a three ring laminate is that if the primary is well timed to expend the least energy possible (most bang for the buck which can be done very easilly with Tesla Ozone Patent shorting method), there may be a cumulative effect over the secondaries and produce some OU.

I know some will say "there goes wattsup again with his standard thinking", but this would not be so standard if the flux can turn three times inside the secondary winding. We are always trying to push current inside a copper condutor to impart coupling to other copper wires when we already know the best way is to move the flux in a laminate and if this flux can turn and turn many times very fast, I think it should make some interesting results.

In any case, I will make one this week and test it.

[poynt99]

You do the simulation first before you ask and read what SM told us.

The circuit is a variation of a "Ring Oscillator".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_oscillator

It can be built with capacitors instead as shown, but the reason for the transformer approach should be obvious.

A possible means to an end.

.99