Towards Realizing the TPU

[forest]

I know that it may be common knowledge but look here : http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14180/css/14180_143.htm

Do I properly compared that with vacuum triode  ?

Bias = heater
Control coil = grid

It's  interesting.

[forest]

Forest, the VTA frequency was pre-programmed at the time of the Barium magnet impulse charge.  This was a severe part of the setup for that device and I don't think changing ti would be simple.

at least that is what the papers I read on it stated.  (Yeah, I played, but never got it...)

Really ? Compare it to TPU :
http://www.hyiq.org/Library/Images/SQMsweet4.jpg
http://www.hyiq.org/Library/Images/SQMsweet5.jpg

[pauldude000]

1. Ferrous ring, with an air gap
2. 2 main driver coils at 90 degrees orientation to each other in series.
3. Audio frequencies
4. "what happens when fields rotate in two directions at once?"

The Lorentz O. That is what happens.

5. Exploding TV set.

What happens when heavy anti-grav is applied directionally and laterally? SM wasn't trying for free energy. SM may well be a figment. This suspiciously looks like a "noise remover" to me.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

I want everyone to know that it required approximately a six month hiatus from working on this to see what is now obvious. My minds eye conjured a multitude of probable effects, using various combinations/methods. 

MOST were... interesting.... to say the least, politely. Extremely dangerous at best.

Yet, I could not reconcile my mental views with reality. What I was envisioning could not be strictly speaking magnetic field effects, though magnetism was involved.

Now I understand what the "other" is. Gravity.

This also led to many other questions and searches, and has led to the asking of some some very hard questions about basal stated truths, intents, and motives.

By the way, for those not conversant with the principle. When knowledge gets in the way of research, it is called "noise".

For example, something "cannot be done" because of x principle or y theory. This is an example of the principle of noise.

To remove noise, you demonstrate visually that something has already been done, which forces the viewer to examine how something HAS to be possible, disregarding previous "can and can't do's", forcing them to find a way to do what they previously thought impossible. You use their own senses against them, so to speak.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

Loner, I will blow your mind a little. I have been necessarily restructuring my understanding of effects as a hole. I no longer even like the term "field", as it is misleading.

I shall state to you that all things witnessed are but effects of three basic types.

1. charges in motion
2. charges at rest
3. lack of charge

Remember that charges tend to be polar in nature, and then the individual effect witnessed from any charge likewise has a corresponding diametric affect. For instance, a magnetic field has two seemingly inseparable poles, with COMPLETE OPPOSITION to the other pole, while seemingly exactly the same effect.

Just as like charges repel, and opposite charges attract, like effects repel and opposite effects attract. This makes all effects polar in nature, but bipolar in general practice.

There have to be at least four separate charge effects, but probably many more yet undiscovered, due entirely to the symmetry of the situation.

Just a thought.

Paul Andrulis