Stanley Meyer and The Water Car Hoax

[sparks]

    Using the cell as a capacitor in a resonant circuit pulsed with  high frequency dc square waves is the most efficient use of input energy.  Throwing straight dc across plates is just plain inefficient and destructive to the electrodes.   There are a couple of ways our ancestors would start a fire.  Rub sticks together and give themselves blisters.  Or smack two rocks together to get a spark and laugh at the idiots rubbing the sticks together.  I hope SM is still laughing!

[vonwolf]

No. The reason skeptics think Meyers is a fraud is because Meyers was prosecuted for fraud. He sold 'dealerships' in his technology without having a working model. That's Fraud 101. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_perpetual_motion_machines

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer#Lawsuit

In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed.[3] According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the Department of energy and the military.[20] His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.[3]

How many time can you bring this up? Some one wanted out and sued him, big deal it hapens in buisness alll the time it does not invalidate all of Stanley Myers work just that the investors got back thier $25 grand big deal!
  How many Of these "Experts" did the Goverment Bring out against Charles Darwin? Attorneys will allways find experts to say just what they need to say thats thier job. Give it a break.

[overcurrent]

wizardofma

You seem to be a knowlegable skeptic so I will ask you this seeings I have not studied meyers work. What do you Know of Tesla, Mooray, and leedkalin from what I have been reading it seems like these men had something signifigant but were either ignored or called quacks because their work didn't agree with the electron theory of electricity. I wouldn't call it a conspiracy I don't believe the government is smart enough to pull that off but I would call it human greed that did those ideas in.

[alan]

For the pseudo-skeptics:
http://www.waterfuelcell.org/ForumPDFs/International%20Independent%20Test%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf

[sparks]

@alan

    Nice document.  I included a link here to a post about plasma as I understand it from research.  Meyers ionization of the gas using lazer excitation  (also doable with ultraviolet) causes the brief formation of a plasma as electrons are drawn to this inertial field from the water in the combustion chamber.   This plasma concentrates the water born electron energy into it's inertial frame.  Subsequent disintegration of the plasma releases a time compressed flow of energy.

                         http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1310.msg132016#msg132016