Stanley Meyer and The Water Car Hoax

[Jason_85]

And if you disagree with something I've said, why not tell me why? I didn't start this thread for a fight, I love to learn and I've thrown my views out there, so let me know what specifically you don't agree with and, more importantly, why. It's all about learning right?

[sparks]

     @Jason

    The highfrequency emwaves that Meyer used act as a catalyst in the electrochemical disassociaton of water.   The response of the mass fields employed to the exposure to the hf pulses and ambient emwave patterns are what "fuels" the reaction.  A tiny bit of gain from the field repeated millions of times a second instead of the slow motion 60hertz field radiations.

[Jason_85]

Thanks sparks. Ok so you're saying that the EM current from the Meyer's electrolyser is not actually providing the power to disassociate the water? But then where is the power coming from? There is a difference in energy state between oxygen/Hydrogen (O2+2H2) and Water (2H2O), so what energy source is providing this difference?

[sparks]

   The standing wave field created by infrared radiation from the sun and the magma core of the Earth is the scource I suspect.   Water has a great affinity for this wavelength.  What I believe and this is not experimentally confirmed is that the hydrogen to oxygen bond is vibrated apart with an increase in amplitude of this wavelength.  Better stated concentration of the ambient infrared wave emmission overcomes the static molecular bond.

[Jason_85]

You are the typical brainwashed University Kid that probably doesn't even know how to use a Screwdriver.
I am a retired Electronic Technician I have dealt with Engineers all of my life.
I had my fill of them. Forget about the B.S. that is being taught,have an open mind and look at the results.I don't care what Qualifications you have on Paper, its not worth the ink that it was written with.Besides if you have Money I can buy any Degree out of the U.S.A.
Meyer is not the only one that drove a Car on a mixture of Hydrogen and Oxygen, you know.
Anyway you are not alone and I feel sorry for all of you.You just can't accept the facts that some of what you were taught in the university is bogus. I would consider it a waist of my time to go any further.
professor

Lovely, and yes you're right Meyer wasn't the only one who drove a car on Hydrogen (Meyer didn't run anything on Hydrogen). Fuel Cell Technology has been a heavy field of reasearch over the past few decade, with many advances. However, none have managed to elude both the laws of thermodynamics and any scientific scrutnity the way that Meyer's Super Electrolysis technology did. But even fuel cells rarely use Hydrogen as a fuel, it is usually used as a storage device (i.e. electricity is used to create hydrogen, the hydrogen is stored in tanks, and burned on demand). It's more of a batter than a fuel.

Meyer's super electrolysis engine didn't run on Hydrogen, it simply used it as a carrier with water as a catalyst. The machine ran on nothing, hence my problem with it.

Jason,

I read it completely. I'm sorry I did. The thoughts you provide are hardly original.

As I sit this early morning, with my first cup of java, I can only compare your thoughts to one thing:

In the kitchen we have a squawking cockatiel. The same song every morning - the same useless rant and repetition of the song yesterday and before. He sets in his cage, squawks, eats, defecates... Nothing will ever happen for him unless he gets out. I'm sure for him almost nothing exists outside of his cage.

Question what you've been taught. Question the obvious. You might find a way out of that cage someday.

I'm trying. Hence I'm here, but to be honest I'm not convinced. Would you be? Other than the responses by sparks I've been greeted by little more than complaining and insults. I'm honestly trying to get a new perspective and this technology does interest me (that's why I'm here). Obviously I don't believe it to work, but everyone has their bias, the best we can do is discuss it together and hopefully get a new perspective.