off OU topic distractions

[Tenbatsu]

Even if Rosemary Ainsile's circuit is not COP>17 or even COP>1 it deserves to be discussed here.

There are plenty of people here at overunity.com that go on and on about having a working overunity device - yet, with perhaps the exception of Omnibus, they get little flak and/or resistance.  Rosemary on the other hand had her thread flooded several times by the same people repeating the same arguments in an attempt to dissuade others from looking into the circuit.  I have to question their motives as most people who disagree with an inventor usually make their comments, defend them to a certain degree, then leave the thread quietly depending on the outcome.  This was definitely not the case in this instance as I believe their goal was to squelch Rosemary Ainslie's thread and halt further public exposure.

If hartiberlin wants this forum to remain successful he needs to implement and apply proper moderation.  It does not need to be heavy handed but even a little moderation would have salvaged that thread.  Squelching discussion is never the answer, maintaining civility should be apart of the forum rules and should be properly enforced by moderators here at all times.

Hopefully this action is not a look at things to come for I fear it will mean the end of this forum as many will find other places to freely interact with their peers without fear of having their work removed and deleted.  I hope you reconsider your actions, Stefan.

[truthbeknown]

Rosemary could have had a fresh start here on her thread. In her very first post she stated what she intended on doing. Did she follow through? Then in reply #3 she started her bad mouthing again about the previous people who tried to help her. And her bad mouthing continued forward from that post. Go read for yourselves. And in the beginning page she had 2 people offer to start a build. What happened to them? Why didn't they do a build? They both still post in this forum. Go read who they are and ask them why they did not follow through. And its too bad that she didn't learn from her warnings from the Admin on EF.com because she was warned to not talk about or mention the names of certain people and to just go about her own business. Did she comply? She would not have been banned if she followed the advice.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  @poynt99 & willby;

   Thank's for bringing this up. It's so disappointing that pepole from other forum's with clear agendas can successfully influence Stephan with ease and silence a discussion of a technology regardless of it's merits of a successful outcome. It my be winter and there is no heater that he knows of but is that what this forum is for? Is only proven technology allowed here? If that's the case some one has a lot of deleting to do.

Guys.  I need to advise you - in the hopes that Stefan won't delete this too.  I have some seminal public domain disclosures relating to our magnetic monopole - that needs to be salvaged as proof of having been made public.  I also suspect that the work related to the thesis is the issue as this is when the flaming was both initiated and allowed.  Poynty?  Someone?  Please help me out and allow those postings due record.  I assure you there's an agenda.  Why else delete?  Just lock - surely?  I've spent the last 12 hours downloading the info on just 1 thread.  But I need to keep it public while there's still some relevant memory related to this.  I'm not concerned about the switching circuit.  We already have a mountain of data.  I just absolutely cannot make it public while I KNOW that this work is being coveted with the intention of stealing it.  Unfortunately none of you actually realise this yet. 

PLEASE HELP ME OUT POYNTY.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

BTW - IF Energetic forum also remove and/or delete my work then that will put paid to this.  It will, I promise you, be resurrected as Harvey's or Glen's work. 

[happyfunball]

Rosemary could have had a fresh start here on her thread. In her very first post she stated what she intended on doing. Did she follow through? Then in reply #3 she started her bad mouthing again about the previous people who tried to help her. And her bad mouthing continued forward from that post. Go read for yourselves. And in the beginning page she had 2 people offer to start a build. What happened to them? Why didn't they do a build? They both still post in this forum. Go read who they are and ask them why they did not follow through. And its too bad that she didn't learn from her warnings from the Admin on EF.com because she was warned to not talk about or mention the names of certain people and to just go about her own business. Did she comply? She would not have been banned if she followed the advice.

It seems quite apparent that she needed to name names in order to sort out who is trying to take credit for her work. You should have all just left her alone and allow her to publish her results.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Stefan,

I am a bit alarmed that you intend on deleting after one week the 3 or 4 threads dealing with Rosemary Ainslie's circuit. 

I agree that there are many posts that could/should be deleted, but the fact remains that the threads were virtually un-moderated, and for that they deteriorated to the level they are at today.

It would be a shame to lose all those posts that are genuine and on-topic. May I suggest that the worst that be done is to delete all non-pertinent, non-technical posts and leave the threads locked, or just leave them locked as they are.

I don't think it is right to delete them in their entirety, unless of course the thread has no technical merit whatsoever.

.99

Just seen this.  I'm so trying to reach either Poynty or Wilby.  I'm taking the trouble to repeat my post.  PLEASE GUYS.  HELP ME OUT.

Rosie

Guys.  I need to advise you - in the hopes that Stefan won't delete this too.  I have some seminal public domain disclosures relating to our magnetic monopole - that needs to be salvaged as proof of having been made public.  I also suspect that the work related to the thesis is the issue as this is when the flaming was both initiated and allowed.  Poynty?  Someone?  Please help me out and allow those postings due record.  I assure you there's an agenda.  Why else delete?  Just lock - surely?  I've spent the last 12 hours downloading the info on just 1 thread.  But I need to keep it public while there's still some relevant memory related to this.  I'm not concerned about the switching circuit.  We already have a mountain of data.  I just absolutely cannot make it public while I KNOW that this work is being coveted with the intention of stealing it.  Unfortunately none of you actually realise this yet.

PLEASE HELP ME OUT POYNTY.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

BTW - IF Energetic forum also remove and/or delete my work then that will put paid to this.  It will, I promise you, be resurrected as Harvey's or Glen's work.