off OU topic distractions

[Rosemary Ainslie]

sorry rosemary, i was not intentionally ignoring you. i replied to some posts and then had to leave. i'm not quite sure where this posted copy of the thread is that you want my assistance with. i checked my pm's and my email and did not find any correspondence from you.

Thank God.  And THANK YOU WILBY.

I'll PM YOU. 

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[DeepCut]

Rosemary i'll keep a copy for you. I'm not sure what the history is here but if all you want to do is make sure that there are multiple copies of your thread in existence then count me in. I've seen a lot of praise for your work so it must be worth keeping.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary i'll keep a copy for you. I'm not sure what the history is here but if all you want to do is make sure that there are multiple copies of your thread in existence then count me in. I've seen a lot of praise for your work so it must be worth keeping.

Hi DeepCut.  I'm not sure how long this window of opportunity is going to be available to me.  I'm reasonably certain that I'll get banned here - within the foreseeable furture.  Certainly it's going to be near impossible to refer to those results that have been obtained - first to prove the thesis - which experiments were validated by many reputable labs - and then the replication - that Glen and Harvey et al are all trying to hide.  Apparently also with the active co-operation and assistance of Stefan.  Surprising when you think that this is probably the ONLY time that those energy barriers have been breached with absolute due and proper record and measurement.

What I'm hoping to get done is the duplication of the thread onto whatever forum - frankly in whatever way possible - and then LOCK that thread - or that forum.  If that can be done?  The more that are posted the better.  If you have friends who could do the same - then please get them to do it.  If we get a mushrooming evidence of that thread that Harti's going to delete - then we've got a chance of keeping that information alive and in the public eye.  And then, too I think that the public will begin to realise how URGENTLY do these horrors - these SUPPRESSORS OF THE TRUTH try to HIDE this good news.   

We've got results due from campus that will absolutely drown out opposition - but I very much doubt that we can risk putting it on the INTERNET first off.  I've learned a very hard lesson.  I think the best way to go is straight to the press.

So.  In whatever way you can help - it'll be a good thing.  I've started a blog.  Here's the link. 

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

Not much on it yet.  But maybe you could try and alert people to its existence.  It'll hopefully be an overview of the thesis and I intend posting our own Quantum paper and the Open source collaboration that turned into the farce that Glen and Harvey orchestrated.  Anyway.  Try and spread the word - wherever you can manage - and obviously only if you have the time.  The work is definitely NOT my work.  It absolutely belongs to us all.  NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WHATSOEVER.  And it needs to stay that way.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[happyfunball]

If you're gonna accuse the owner of the forum of collusion, I agree you're going to get banned Rosemary. He's deleting all of their stuff too, you know.

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy reading Members and Guests,

Does anyone know the meaning of the word "perjury" ??   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding.[1] That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the case.

The rules for perjury also apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury, even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official.

What we have here is a "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd from "Rosemary Ainslie" on a Copyright dispute of a document ( Scribd )  doc/26240411

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Scribd/Ainslie^_Affidavit^_Scribd.pdf   (verifiable)


We have a Tektronix e-mail about the equipment used in the "Open Source" testing and evaluation events -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Tektronix/Request^_for^_return^_due^_to^_misleading^_intent.pdf   (verifiable)


We have documents (doc/26240411) taken down by IEEE on Scribd with the note displayed "This content was removed at the request of IEEE" up loaded by aetherevarising  ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft

***************************************************************************************************
 


What IEEE does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Tektronix does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Scribd does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business.

But being my name is on the  "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie it's my business also with the unfounded unproven allegations and possible slander ....... and I do know what the meaning of "perjury" is .....


Regards,
Glen