RFI: Bedini, bearden, lindemann class action lawsuite

[professor]

The energy gathered from the collapsing magnetic field of the coil is not "free energy", it is merely the energy stored by the magnetic field of the coil.

When you charge up a capacitor, it is storing energy as charge. and when you discharge it, you are only getting back what was stored. The same applies to an inductor. When you initially connect an inductor, the energy used to create the magnetic field is stored in that field. When you disconnect the inductor, the collapse of the magnetic field releases the stored energy.

Yes, you can charge a battery or run some other piece of circuitry with this stored energy, but you will never charge a battery at a greater (or even equal) amount of current than what the supply battery is providing.

The total mechanical torque of the motor plus the electrical energy of the output from the collapsing field, (and any additional separate pick up coils), when added together, is still less than the total electrical energy consumed by the motor.

This becomes very evident over the long term, when using two batteries of identical capacity. Use one for the circuit supply and one for charging. First discharge the battery that you are going to charge,  then use the other to charge it. Then reverse the batteries and do the same again. Repeat over and over. Eventually both batteries will go flat.

Bedini, Bearden and Lindemann try to tell the uneducated, that the energy from the collapsing field is "free" energy, when in fact it is only stored energy, which was put into the system in the first place by the supply battery.

I have, over the years, made over a hundred variations of the Bedini and Adam's motors, and whilst it was/is possible to make very efficient motors which recycle the energy stored in the driving coil, none exhibit any genuine O/U.

Cheers from Hoptoad

Hi Hoptoad
I fully agree with all of your Article there is no more energy coming back as you input,unless you add an additional source like passing the EMF through a magnetic field which may add extra Energy derivative
from the Magnet.there are too many unsubstantiated Claims by these inventors like the SELFRUNNING
COLD Electricity Circuit from Stiffler being a total misconception of an RF Circuit.
When you smell the mighty Dollar you loose reality and  resort to all kinds of shenanigans.
professor

[alan]

On the SSG, as fast a the secondary voltage rises, even faster it drops when put a load on it.
In part 6 of EFTV Bedini states: it is a different electricity, a radiant type.
Sounds like bull. Of course the SSG works, but no one seems interested in showing evidence of excess energy.
I must admit I was impressed by the demonstration in eftv6, where he charges a capacitor within a couple of revolutions and shows the big spark after shorting it out.

[nitinnun]

it is incredibly simple, to test the science that the bedini motor runs on.
just hook a multimeter up to a wire coil, and move a magnet over the wire coil.


you will get voltage AND amperage.
much more than the magnet could possibly be losing.
(if the magnet is losing anything at all.)

the rest of the bedini motor, is to support the above activity.
and to make the above activity efficient enough, to create more electricity than is consumed.


the bedini motor, has little that needs "proving".
the bedini motor is mostly about "improving".

[alan]

Incredible claims need incredible proof, until then it's based on believe.

[WilbyInebriated]

When you smell the mighty Dollar you loose reality and  resort to all kinds of shenanigans.
professor

like the churches?

Incredible claims need incredible proof, until then it's based on believe.

have you built one yet alan? until then your opinions are based on your beliefs...