Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


I WANT FREE ENERGY NOW!!!

Started by cyclopz, September 24, 2008, 12:23:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

Two phenomena;
Faraday's law is a single equation describing two different phenomena: the motional EMF generated by a magnetic force on a moving wire (see Lorentz force), and the transformer EMF generated by an electric force due to a changing magnetic field (due to the Maxwell–Faraday equation).

James Clerk Maxwell drew attention to this fact in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. In the latter half of Part II of that paper, Maxwell gives a separate physical explanation for each of the two phenomena.

A reference to these two aspects of electromagnetic induction is made in some modern textbooks. As Richard Feynman states:

So the "flux rule" that the emf in a circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit applies whether the flux changes because the field changes or because the circuit moves (or both) ...

Yet in our explanation of the rule we have used two completely distinct laws for the two cases – v × B for "circuit moves" and ∇ × E = −∂tB for "field changes".

We know of no other place in physics where such a simple and accurate general principle requires for its real understanding an analysis in terms of two different phenomena.

— Richard P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics 
The reason for me posting this is a logical one, the two forms of EMF generation ARE NOT THE SAME. the Transformer equation is bound by the conservation of energy, EMF generated by a Motional Electric Field are NON CONSERVATIVE and therefore can produce above unity in which a Transformer can NOT.

  "The Maxwell–Faraday equation is a modification and generalisation of Faraday's law that states that a time-varying magnetic field will always accompany a spatially varying, non-conservative electric field, and vice versa."

say that again....... NON - CONSEVATIVE Electric field. meaning a Motional Electric field does NOT conform to the Laws of Conservation of Energy and thus a system can be contructed that takes advantage of this very fact.

The Figuera system is such a device that once started it can and will power it's self and the load a standard generator and standard Transformer can NOT.
This applies to the standard off the shelf transformer ONLY as there are steps to side step this fact and the 1932 Coutier device does just that as does a few others..

Regards,
Marathonman

bolt

Free energy is very expensive! Those that have it spent a life time in labor and materials.

marathonman

The 1932 Coutier device will be the easiest and cheapest to build.
Marathonman

e2matrix

I found the Coutier patent (not sure if it has been posted here before but I'll attach it here) but I don't think I could  build it based on the info in the patent.   Too many things it it and the diagrams are not clear.   Very interesting though....

marathonman

e2matrix;
A 12 or 24 volt to 120 or 240 volt converter can be the driving force pushing the first center core with maybe a power resistor or Rheostat possibly to keep it at say 1 amp. then at the middle feed back can be stepped down to the original 12 or 24 volts aided by caps and such.
I think the whole key is a few things like the outer cores must equal the center core plus the outer cores must have the same winding count as the center core. then on top of that the wire must get thicker in each set progresses.

each outer core will pick up 1 amp from the center core then paralleled to attain 6 amp.
saturation is the enemy in this device as it will clip the wave form.

Marathonman