Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

Started by captainpecan, November 16, 2008, 11:02:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

captainpecan

Quote from: Shrexes on December 14, 2008, 12:37:19 AM
At best, the amount of energy generated from the spinning wheel would be the amount of energy due to the density transfer anyway. In this case, the water pressure has a measurable force. Now, if the wheel were attached to a turbine of some kind that was too strong to be moved by the water, than you're only replacing the barrier that was originally there to keep the tank pressurized.

At best, what your rig is doing is using up energy that would otherwise be lost. Much like the dissipation in heat from the brake pads and the way that's used in newer cars. It's a more efficient use of a system, but it follows all equations set before it.

If that were true, wouldn't I not have gotten the energy split between the two caps in the video when I almost locked up the motor? This is the part that was interesting, there was no noticeable difference with a heavy load, as apposed to no load.  Do I have all the answers, definitely not.  I'm just kicking around theories that I cant seem to prove wrong completely.  Input from others is why it's even posted.

Shrexes

I'm not sure, but I don't think that you could use all of the generators to power up the same Cap. I don't think a generator powered by 18V could fill a capacitor of 18V, or even any more than what is "lost" in the transfer. I haven't taken physics in almost 4 years, and I was horrible at circuitry, but I still don't think you get any free work, you are only using the work that would be lost anyway. And that work will be equal among all of the generators on the circuit, and even an infinite number of them running on the same voltage cannot combine themselves to push energy into a capacitor because the capacitor will still be pushing back harder than the generators.

I don't know. It sounds expensive to test, but if you can do it, I'll be impressed.

Shrexes

I don't think the load matters because the electricity is going to pass through the coil regardless. The fact that the movement by the magnet is being restricted is irrelevant. Again, all the electrons care about is getting through the wire. They don't care about anything else along the way.

captainpecan

Quote from: Shrexes on December 14, 2008, 01:00:26 AM
I'm not sure, but I don't think that you could use all of the generators to power up the same Cap. I don't think a generator powered by 18V could fill a capacitor of 18V, or even any more than what is "lost" in the transfer. I haven't taken physics in almost 4 years, and I was horrible at circuitry, but I still don't think you get any free work, you are only using the work that would be lost anyway. And that work will be equal among all of the generators on the circuit, and even an infinite number of them running on the same voltage cannot combine themselves to push energy into a capacitor because the capacitor will still be pushing back harder than the generators.

I don't know. It sounds expensive to test, but if you can do it, I'll be impressed.

The same way you can charge a capacitor up to 800v with a 1.5v AA battery in a disposable camera.  Also, nothing says you have to charge the exact cap that is pushing the discharge.  Switch caps. Then all the generators ever have to do is top off a cap from 9.5v to 18v, while being ran off the potential of the other cap discharging it's 18v back down to 9.5v.

Is it proven to work...  nope.  But it hasn't been proven not to work yet either.  It's a theory that seems more reasonable than many others I've seen, as a way to accomplish a supposedly impossible feat to begin with, free energy. lol....

captainpecan

Quote from: Shrexes on December 14, 2008, 01:05:07 AM
I don't think the load matters because the electricity is going to pass through the coil regardless. The fact that the movement by the magnet is being restricted is irrelevant. Again, all the electrons care about is getting through the wire. They don't care about anything else along the way.

And that's part of the interesting thing.  If you ran the motor, direct shorting a battery instead of the way described here.  Load that motor down and it draws amps like crazy and will burn up. There is a noticeable difference here, at least it seems to me.  It's like motors were designed to run this way, and not the way we all do it.