Canceling Lenz's Law - Methods

[dieter]

Just one more thing:
You have to prevent the magnetic field to avoid the middle core leg. This could happen when a load (like a amp meter) will reduce it's permeability compared to the outer legs. Then 90% of the flux would go trough the outer legs. result: low current induced.


The (unfort. rather complicated) solution may be: while the current is induced (PM passes by), have no load on the coil, but a load on two additional coils around the outer legs. Then, when the field collapses, switch them, so the middle coil has now current flow, although back emf only, and the outer coils have no load. Transistors may be used to switch.


In fact, the more I think about it, the more variables I see, so this allows for a lot of challenging experimentation.


PS. BTW. Neodym PMs don't work well, better use less strong ceramic, like barium-ferrite or similar, they have a better field spread. Bedini says so, and my experience with adams motors is the same.

[Magluvin]

Hey Marius

Lenz.  So when the coil is loaded the motor slows down?

Here is a vid of using an ecore as the large inductance in Teslas  "Igniter for Gas Engines that I did some time back.  This was after my Orbo experiments.  The ecore inductor acted like an orbo, while charging a cap for the drive coils, as in when the ecore inductor was conducting, the core would allow the rotor to pass the core after being attracted to it.  Timing. In my case anyway. Try the ecore in different positions around the rotor. Not sure if it will help here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2MwBg33D80

There are other vids of mine before and after this one that show more.

Mags

[mariuscivic]

Hi

At the right distance, the coil is not seen by the rotor. The load is small but never happened this before with a normal core/coil. I will do that again with my ''one point touch shaft-rotor'' to eliminate the bearings and see the results.
Now we have this:
12V/118mA input
1.7V output over the led
2300 rpm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4hOlUzrY4I&feature=youtu.be

[hanon]

Hi all,

These are very interesting videos about BUCKING COILS used to avoid the Lenz effect as exposed in hyiq.org site:

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA   ( based in this pdf: "Guidelines to Bucking Coils" in hyiq.org --> http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcks2fcpHUk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTykNjDD0CM  (this video is just to get the idea. I think with this wiring the resulting voltage will be null, but I think with one coil CW and the other CCW with an intermediate wiring connection to extract the induced voltage. )

I hope to be helpful.


Surely all this was used by Garry Stanley in his anti-lenz coils ( http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5911-garry-stanley-pulse-motor.html )

[kmarinas86]

There is the tendency to conserve the magnetic moment of the magnetic field. It applies to situations where there are conductors.

http://www.capca.ucalgary.ca/wdobler/publications/preprints/MagneticMoment.pdf

It is shown that the magnetic moment (mu) is a conserved quantity not only in MHD, but also in general electrodynamics under certain not very restrictive conditions. The propagation of magnetic moment from a region D with an evolving current system (e. g. due to dynamo action) is discussed for the two cases of vacuum and a conducting medium, respectively, surrounding D. In the case of vacuum, the MHD approximation no longer holds and the weak electromagnetic wave emitted from D is important, as w as pointed out by Sokoloff (1997). In the case of an unbounded conducting medium, the classical denition of (mu) is generalised and (mu) is shown to propagate diffusively, undisturbed by the newly generated magnetic field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment

The magnetic moment may be considered to be a vector having a magnitude and direction. The direction of the magnetic moment points from the south to north pole of the magnet. The magnetic field produced by the magnet is proportional to its magnetic moment.

Now, with Lenz' law, the idea is that the change of the magnetic field, or in other texts, the change of magnet flux, is resisted, rather than magnetic moment. My wager that this is the key mistake resulting in the delay of discovering the underlying principle behind "Anti-Lenz" devices.

Consider the S-Motor as an expression of the underlying principle:
http://www.overunity.com/15648/the-s-motor-mechanical-and-ac-power-generator-no-batteries-or-capacitors/

The S-Motor consists of a magnet rotating inside a "rectangular coil" bent into an S shape. When the magnet rotates in the vicinity of the closed copper circuit, there is an induced magnetic moment which opposes the change of the magnetic moment of the magnet. But in the S-motor, unlike in other motors, the induced magnetic moment is split into three levels, upper, middle, and lower magnetic moments, corresponding to the upper, middle, and lower sections of the S, respectively. The magnetic moment in the middle is the reverse of Lenz' law, while the upper and lower magnetic moments follow Lenz' law. Note that all three arise from the same current which flows through different sections of the S-coil. Success of the design depends on the magnetic field of the magnet coupling most strongly to the middle magnetic moment.