Joule Thief

[WilbyInebriated]

i wanted to copy this over from the 'joule thief and its derivatives' thread before poynt99 deletes it.

You're not making much sense Mk1 

Do you have a point or a contribution?

I doubt all folks are as up to speed on the JT as you seem to think you are, and since you're anxious to move forward, study this:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

...and this seems to clearly sum up your knowledge of this circuit:
What invention are you referring to? Are you saying that a bcap being charged by a small boost converter circuit is new, novel or worthy of a patent?

Please try to make some rational sense in your posts this point forward, or they'll probably be deleted.

.99

he made total sense. his point is same as the one i brought up... which is, you're not adding anything new to the discussion. at least you haven't yet. all of what you have said has been covered numerous times in the jt thread. maybe you should study it and you wouldn't have to resort to incorrect assumptions like your 'summation' of mk1's knowledge about the circuit... are you saying you have read the thread entirely or are you jumping the gun?

Okay so from what i know, there was a video from a couple of guy's that showed how to build a joule thief.
They showed that with this device it was possible to lite up LED's from a battery, of which terminal voltage was too low to power the LED's directly.
They said the battery was empty.

So it was a device to get the last bit of energy out of a battery by boosting up the voltage...
Just a means to boost up the voltage to power the LED, and they never even made a OU claim what so ever.

Then these JT threads start to pop up on the boards and people are claiming OU from JT circuits....

Marco.

have you actually read the thread marco are you engaging in assumption and conjecture too?
no one to my knowledge has claimed OU in the joule thief thread until now... other than IST, but when isn't IST claiming OU? a lttle less hyperbole and a little more accuracy please.

[innovation_station]

j

for the large unit is where i would like to apply a joint efford form the members here at ou to the output winding .. of the gold ring ..


it must be the least amount of turns for the highest output .. and  weather it is centertapped or not is no concern   but i would like to put many on it!

but im still hung up on dow ... to get my stuff shipped .. this will ravel out soon ..
 
i will post some of my coils .. really basic ones in 101 thred

[guruji]

Hi guys today I did four led lights as Jeanna said in parallel but I had to wind three around the JT for led lights to show bright. Even the aa battery was charging too thanks to Gadgetmall circuit.
Thanks guys.

[jeanna]

Hi guys today I did four led lights as Jeanna said in parallel but I had to wind three around the JT for led lights to show bright.

eesh some people are hard to please!
I actually did a study waaay back which was to show how many turns made how much light. There was an overlap of turns and numbers of lights, but 3 turns per light is very good.
If you were to put those lights in series you would need 3-5 turns per light.

Even the aa battery was charging too thanks to Gadgetmall circuit.

This is so great that you are doing this.

thank you,

for the large unit is where i would like to apply a joint efford form the members here at ou to the output winding .. of the gold ring ..

of course... and I agree too.

it must be the least amount of turns for the highest output .. and  weather it is centertapped or not is no concern   but i would like to put many on it!

I was not sure from your earlier post if you wanted help with the explanation of the mk1jeanna hybrid. If you can understand how I described it, then that is fine.


thank you
jeanna

[innovation_station]

it will need to built for that core ..

but  1 step at a time if everyone has the same cores .. 

then we can truely perfect it ..

w