Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.

jadaro2600

Quote from: xee2 on February 14, 2010, 12:07:39 AM
@ jadaro2600

Another interesting circuit. Great  work. Do you know what the inductor values are. I would suspect that the larger they are the higher the C-E voltage will be.

EDIT: I see you answered in your edit as I was posting. Thanks.

No problem.  I did notice there was a sort of inverse relation though; here is a picture, if I had more LEDs - I would light them as well.

Lower leads are off to the ammeter.  ~30mA.  Blue is the option path I explored, dashed line is optional, removing when operating seems to increase functionality.

note: the diodes in the image are all light emitting diodes - I seem to lack a decent LED icon to use with my software.

xee2

@ jadaro2600

This is just a guess.

The voltage is probably lower on the 100 uh side because the 100 uH inductor has a larger resistance. It is the resistance rather than the inductance that is reducing the voltage (transistor can not draw as much current because of the higher resistance). You could increase the current by reducing the base resistor value.

EDIT: On second thought, reducing base resistor will not help. The current is limited by I=E/R and thus there is only so much current that will go through the 100 uH inductor resistance with 1.5 volts. So the only way to get the advantage of the larger inductance would be to find a 100 uH inductor with the same resistance as your 10 uH inductor.

jadaro2600

Quote from: xee2 on February 14, 2010, 01:06:32 AM
@ jadaro2600

This is just a guess.

The voltage is probably lower on the 100 uh side because the 100 uH inductor has a larger resistance. It is the resistance rather than the inductance that is reducing the voltage (transistor can not draw as much current because of the higher resistance). You could increase the current by reducing the base resistor value.

I noticed it behave like this in both the original and the altered versions.  I think it's odd, but I suspect that the increased voltage is due to the decreased switching frequency ( or the disparity of frequencies ) between the two.  I will have to tinker with it some more.

Goal is to decrease current usage over all.

xee2

@ jadaro2600

If you did not see my edit on my previous post on last page, please read it.

xee2

@ jadaro2600

My comments are based on my experience with this circuit. In order to get the LED to be bright I had to make my own inductor in order to get a low resistance (50 ohms was for the manufactured one). But this was 100 mH and you are only using 100 uH so your problems my be different.