Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

crowclaw

May have to include base  limiter resistors to adjust current draw. Ideally circuit components need to be matched, i.e. inductors / resistors.

Dave45

Xee2 posted this schematic for a limited self runner, it only charges one side of the cap.
I finished it, havent tested it yet,,,,soon.

MarkE

Dave, Neither circuit charges the capacitor from the oscillator portion.  Both charge the capacitor from the battery.  There is no such thing as charging one side of a capacitor anymore than it is possible to stretch one side of an extension spring.  Xee2's circuit draws power from the capacitor through the transformer secondary and the transistor when the transistor is on.  When the transistor turns off, energy stored in the transformer recirculates through the LED.  Your dual circuit just puts two of Xee2's circuits in parallel, where one switches the low side like Xee2's, and the other switches the high side. 

Dave45

Hey Mark
I hope your wrong my friend, I see things a little differently.
I'll build it tomorrow.

MarkE

Dave, it is basic theory that has been tested countless times.  A test that you can do is to add switches so that you can run with just the NPN, just the PNP, or both the NPN and PNP sides of your device.  You should find that the run down time is faster with the PNP than the NPN due to a lower efficiency.  You should find that with both of them, the run down time is a bit less than half the run down time with the NPN side alone.

If you have an oscilloscope and a low inductance current sense resistor, then you can monitor the capacitor current by placing the current sense resistor in series between the negative side of the capacitor and the est of the circuit.  The scope probe ground clip goes to the low side of the capacitor.  With either just the NPN or PNP side running you will see a saw tooth current drawn from the capacitor.  With both running, because they are not synchronized, you will see two asynchronous sawtooth waveforms that move in time relative to one another.

The modification that you have made to the current flow when the transistor is on is wrong.  Positive convention current flows from the voltage source: battery or capacitor through the coil and through the transistor.  That builds up energy in the magnetic field in and around the transformer.  When the transistor turns off, energy stored in that field causes the voltage across the inductor to flyback until the LED provides a path for the current.  Energy in the stored winding inductance then discharges through the LED.