Joule Thief

[Mk1]

@Jeanna

Welcome back , Nassim Haramein , is a great man , even if he did not invent the flower of life , he is one of the best at explaining it for every one to understand , he is one of the most important thinker of our age.

Mark

[jadaro2600]

@ jadaro2600

Not a flaw, but a reminder. When the LED is in the circuit it will limit the collector voltage to the LED forward voltage drop (usually about 3.5 volts), so any voltage changes due to the transformer will not be evident.

I've noted this - I take measurements with and without the LED in place.  After coating with magnetic paint, a reduction in voltage occurred.  This is puzzling to me.

@TheNOP,

I've watched both of these lecture - in fact, ALL of them from the 8.02 series.  Very interesting stuff.

@jeanna,

I've noticed that smaller versions of my coil about a coil design don't work as well.  There seems to be a g-spot with these types - which is only slightly comforting.

I like the picture though - it's thought provoking.  But I still don't know what you mean by three axis.  I have my own ideas, ..such as trisecting volumetrically a sphere ..and putting soils in that configuration, but things get complicated.

It seems wise to have the voltage collecting medium at the center of everything collapsing.

[Mk1]

@jadaro

Are you trying to tell us something that we don't get yet , i admirer your persistence in expressing your idea , i am still not sure of your motive , can you lite a neon on your experiment ? Or make usable voltage ? except lighting led because any jt dose that. Maybe people don't see a point in what you are doing except pure research , your experiment show well why the jt works in the first place induction between the wires , but i still am i bit lost on why perusing that alternative since its not really anything new , now please make one of those with many wire run the jt on two of those and see if there anything in the other coil.Sorry if you feel your idea are not followed but people don't follow what they don't understand.

@all

Some people earn a living making people fight on forums and prevent proper exchange of idea , google dirty dozen , but there is more to it. And yes there are some trolls on this site, why are there none in our jt topic , maybe because there are no tpu in the tittle , or we don't know who they are.

Dose any one knows what tpu stands for. and tell me what we are doing here.

[jeanna]

But I still don't know what you mean by three axis.  I have my own ideas, ..such as trisecting volumetrically a sphere ..and putting soils in that configuration, but things get complicated.

It seems wise to have the voltage collecting medium at the center of everything collapsing.

I think you're on it. I don't know exactly what I mean either. But, it has always made sense to me that if we follow the shapes of nature, we will find ourselves wealthy with abundance, the way nature is. I don't see why this should not apply to electricity and magnetism.

I am sure you know what I mean by 3 axes. x,y,z.

Here is how I think it relates to this cosmic geometry.

The x,y axes are described in the locus of points going around the height and width of the toroid.
The z axis is described either in the wires that you (and others like ist) have made with the garden wire, or in the collection of it all in the secondaries that go through the center.

But, I am still intrigued by the picture that shows the energy shooting both up and down in a spiral formation. And this reminds me of your linear transformer (I think) where you twisted 2 wires tightly around each other.

So, I am wondering if you could not get a better result with your twisted-2 wires as collector wires than the regular secondaries we have all been making from simple mag wires.

thank you (and others too) for your interesting work,

jeanna

[jeanna]

I don't know if this will help or hurt. I just added the 3 axes.

jeanna