Joule Thief

[gadgetmall]

@all

Again for those that did not see it yet ! Even Stefan commented it as 2:1 overunity  .

This can work with the jt , gadget know !

Mark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQdcwDCBoNY&feature=channel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Idey7O0WlU0&feature=channel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xefg-EfC4Q&feature=channel_page

Yes i do know . If you look at it this way . Replace the Sg with our transistor Osc . we have our signal generator then we TUNE it for Least Input Ma . WALA . Its what i have been saying all along . We need to get the input DOWN With Resonate Tank CIRCUITS !!!once resonate we have low input high output  . Good FIND MK1 !!

Gadget

[innovation_station]

Yes i do know . If you look at it this way . Replace the Sg with our transistor Osc . we have our signal generator then we TUNE it for Least Input Ma . WALA . Its what i have been saying all along . We need to get the input DOWN With Resonate Tank CIRCUITS !!!once resonate we have low input high output  . Good FIND MK1 !!

Gadget

THIS MY BROS WORK    LOL
HOW EVER THERE BETTER WAYS AS I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG 

GREAT WORK BRO !!

IST!

[allcanadian]

@xee2
Quote:
"This another example of someone coming to crazy conclusions because they do not understand what they are doing. There is no power gain. There is only misunderstanding. He needs to spend a couple of years learning AC circuit theory. DC power equations can not be used to compute AC power."

No, this is another example of a person making baseless assumptions. I have done the experiment and it works as described, you see you have to actually perform the experiments to prove there validity or not. As well I have had conversations with the person in the video and I would consider him to have an advanced understanding of AC circuit theory, more so than most people I have met in this forum and that is why for most people what he does seems impossible.

Quote:
"This is a common two layer solenoid coil. I do not understand why you call it a "tesla bifiliar". Using uncommon names for common things only creates confusion as to what you are talking about."

Well, it is called a "Tesla Bifilar" because one Nicola Tesla invented and patented it in january 9,1894. Patent 512340 "Coil for Electro-Magnets". Take note of the date ----1894, this is well before anyone here was even born, before we had all these fancy measuring devices. Due credit and respect should be given to any persons who have made this world a better place---versus those who just talk about it.

Regards
AC

[xee2]

@ allcanadian

I agree that due respect should be given to inventors. But electronics has progressed a lot in the last 100 years. And perhaps using current terminology would make things easier to understand for non-historians.

As a historian, you also probably know that the inductive coupling experiment was done by Hertz a long time ago using spark gaps. I and thousands of other people have done versions of this experiment since then. I did not say it did not work. I said the explanation was wrong and that there is no power gain. If you do not understand that then you should check out some of what has been learned in the last 100 years.

[jeanna]

I will let the task to find which connection produce that behavior to the young.
Jesus

Well, jesus,
That statement is the only failure I can see here.
I really mean it.
It takes courage to be willing to be wrong.
You have showed your courage many times in your willingness to risk being wrong.

You save others a lot of time and trouble when you publish your mistakes along with your successes.
To know that this sort of worked with a loose connection may be the clue you or someone else needs to make it really work.

Look up resinrat2's signature. I need to leave for the day so I cannot, but it is perfect about research and failures.

jeanna