Joule Thief

[innovation_station]

MK1
Did you verify the claims yourself?

You know it was Faraday who tried and tried to find electricity coming from a steady magnetic field and he found he could not.

Are you saying you have found how to do that?
I do not think sticking a magnet onto a pulsing magnetic field is the same thing, but is that what you mean by standing magnet?
I have found that adding a magnet increases frequency and lowers voltage.
I personally believe higher frequency actually means we need less amps, so it may work.

@ist,
Have you been able to get heat from less than the watt cost of a standard heater?
I watched your spark heaters and It got me thinking a lot about immersion heaters, but in those videos you were using so much power, it was hard to see if what you were doing was more efficient??
Was it?

I found what you were showing very hopeful, but I was not too sure about the power use.

jeanna

a good test for you would be to try it jeanna ... 

of course there is MUCH MORE POWER THERE ...

can you melt a carbon rod with 68 watts?

68 watts is nothing when your CURRENTLY PAYING 1000W TO DO THE SAME THING..

AND MY LAST RESPONCE ON THIS MATTER ....  IS JUST THIS ...

DID EDDISIONS GENERATORS KILL PEOPLE .... ?

IST!

[xee2]

@resonanceman

Almost  all of my  stuff  has been with a single  AA  so far

I have gone up to 9 volts so far. I got up to 3,000 volts with the AA and 16,000 with a 9 volt transistor radio battery. But, I think with what you have it may not be safe to use more than the AA. I am just using clip leads, but all of the wires are spaced far apart.

[tagor]

First the claims have been verified publicly in a electronic magazine . 1970s french i read . included in the last post.

I have spoke a lot on " la synergetique" , D'Hoker , naudin's VSG and so on :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4744.msg98997#msg98997

there is no verification on this device or others similars devices

look at this thread :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1310.msg10528#msg10528

[stprue]

Welcome back stprue!
I am glad to see you.

About this video.
I would say we all have been doing this all along on this thread.
We are using a joule thief circuit to produce pulses which
change the magnetic flux in the stationery coil
which is wrapped around a toroid core.
It can be (he shows) a stick instead of a toroid,
but last week when I got my inductance meter, I saw with my own eyes how much more you get from the toroid.
It is worth any extra trouble, for sure.

So, yes, you have been doing this at least since you joined this thread.

So, did you ever get the help you needed?
You had such a lot of voltage from so little turns, but unfortunately,
I couldn't answer your question.

I hope you did.

jeanna

I kinda got my questions ansewered, I want to make a tube video to show this coil but I have been very busy with work lately.  If anything it will show people a way to use a 10 second pulse to get about 20 minutes of led energy out.   I have been following the don smith thread and I'm very interested in what Yucca is doing over there.  I think I may start tinkering with this tech but I still want to try one last solar JT idea before switching over for a while.

[stprue]

@stprue

I am glad you found this , even if one youtube at the end of his third video he dose state no OU, i feel his experiment is not conclusive because he is missing the most important part.

I have seen this patent before , claims 1 amps in and 10 amps out , but could not find it anymore , thanks for posting.

http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf

if you look at the patent there is 10 secondary , connected in parallel making it possible to get 10 x out 1 x per coil.

http://www.intalek.com/Papers/Handout3.pdf

This is basically what i have been doing all along , to get the ou it needs a standing magnetic field provided by a magnet.

Also this http://www.rexresearch.com/meyernmr/meyer.htm

i have posted this before verified claims 1 watt in 30 watt out.

it work from the nuclear reaction for some iron isotope(56) (copper work but could be better), it sound worst then it is actually it means the reaction under electro magnetic stress it becomes magnetic.

Based on the last input from SM his device works from this same reaction...

Wow thanks for all the additional infos!  I have heard about iron going through some sort of reaction like you stated...I wonder what the long term effects would be on the iron???