Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

Vortex1

Farmhand:

I've been optimizing on the bench and in simulations a similar circuit that I posted here: http://www.overunity.com/14591/lasersaber-strikes-again-a-joule-thief-king/msg402950/#msg402950

But that was the elementary schematic, I have made many improvements that lower power drain etc.

This circuit has a number of advantages over a blocking oscillator, one of which is better control of inductor current and switch off point.

The disadvantage is base switching current for the NPN does not come from the current step up feature of a well designed single transistor blocking oscillator's coupled inductor, rather it comes directly from the supply, but there are many interesting circuit mods in the two transistor circuit to minimize this current.

This  two transistor topology can be arranged to provide a very wide pulse repetition rate, making brightness control over a wide range easy.

I prefer this single inductor two transistor circuit topology over blocking oscillator types for most applications but each has it's place, depends on what you want to do.

Regards, Vortex1 (ION)

Farmhand

Yep I seen your circuit and that's why I decided to try some things.

It seems for running down to lower input voltages the coil has a lot to do with helping, I found a coil with more self inductance will work for much better output at lower input voltages, although the frequency is lower, I'm using the full resistance in series with the PNP base. It's running down to 0.8 volts and lighting one led with 1.33 volts RMS and 4.32 volts max at 8.5 kHz. 

Coil is a 3 mH or so on ferrite.

In the low power mode with more base resistance it can light one LED real bright with 1.2 volts and uses a lot less power but the light gets low when at 0.8 volts.

Still, it can boost a very old leaky 200 uF capacitor to 6 volts from 0.8 volts input, in a second or two which might be useful as well.  :)


..

MarkE

Quote from: Farmhand on June 07, 2014, 08:20:03 PM
Yep I seen your circuit and that's why I decided to try some things.

It seems for running down to lower input voltages the coil has a lot to do with helping, I found a coil with more self inductance will work for much better output at lower input voltages, although the frequency is lower, I'm using the full resistance in series with the PNP base. It's running down to 0.8 volts and lighting one led with 1.33 volts RMS and 4.32 volts max at 8.5 kHz. 

Coil is a 3 mH or so on ferrite.

In the low power mode with more base resistance it can light one LED real bright with 1.2 volts and uses a lot less power but the light gets low when at 0.8 volts.

Still, it can boost a very old leaky 200 uF capacitor to 6 volts from 0.8 volts input, in a second or two which might be useful as well.  :)


..
That's probably because each time that the circuit switches it suffers switching losses.

Pirate88179

Does anyone know if I can put two 47 uH axial inductors (like the ones in a solar garden light) together in series or parallel to get a 94 uH inductor?

Thanks,

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

TinselKoala

Quote from: Pirate88179 on June 07, 2014, 09:16:29 PM
Does anyone know if I can put two 47 uH axial inductors (like the ones in a solar garden light) together in series or parallel to get a 94 uH inductor?

Thanks,

Bill

Yes, series.
Like resistors: inductors in series simply add. Inductors in parallel do the inverse thing: Lfinal = 1/(1/L1 + 1/L2 + ....)