Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Farmhand

Yeah I realize that loss, and I try to adjust it so the ringing is gone and when I adjust it further to cramp up the wave form it raises the amplitude. And it's at that setting it seems most efficient, no ringing at all because no time for ringing. I adjusted it back just to reduce the power output but then the JT's boosted voltage became higher anyway  ;D and the output from the second oscillator stayed just a bit less, not much, so better to run it without the ringing. The test coil is a ringy coil. That will be changed out for a smaller one.

Could probably run a low power micro there if the voltage could be controlled from the initial boost side.

..

TinselKoala

"Ringy" is good because it means high Q which means small losses per cycle in the resonant ringing. On the other hand eliminating ringing by shortening the time between stimulating pulses is good because then you are approaching true resonant pumping, where a tiny push at the exact right time keeps a high-amplitude response going and this is not allowed to decay.
I think. Maybe.


mscoffman

Quote from: MarkE on June 09, 2014, 01:44:11 AM
A 74, 74LS, etc 5V series TTL or 4000 series CMOS will not work. 

The key to Dave Johnson's circuit is the ultra low voltage logic gate:  Digikey P/N   296-13169-1-ND  This is one gate in a package the size of an SOT-23 transistor but with five leads instead of three.

http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/SN74AUC1G04DCKR/296-13169-1-ND/484306

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn74auc1g04.pdf

The device is rated for a power supply voltage down to 0.8V, but will go lower.


A 74x14 hysteresis inverter version exists too.

http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/SN74AUC1G14DBVR/296-12880-6-ND/1634643




MarkE

Quote from: mscoffman on June 09, 2014, 02:55:45 PM


A 74x14 hysteresis inverter version exists too.

http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/SN74AUC1G14DBVR/296-12880-6-ND/1634643
One would have to experiment to see if the AUC14 works better at below spec supply voltage than the AUC04 .  The hysteresis of the '14 will probably make it harder to start oscillating.

Farmhand

Umm I scoped the base of the JT transistors base and it is going negative by almost 10 volts when the transistor is off !
What's the go with that - is that ok ? No wonder it lights the red LED backwards there.

Can I make use of that voltage to bootstrap the JT supply voltage some how ?

....