How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms

[supermuble]

I wrote this today to explain how a free energy transformer works. This also explains why a regular transformer always wastes electrical power. My terms could be wrong, but this explanation should serve well as a starting point for people who wish to experiment.

I got the idea mainly from Thane Haynes. His education on transformers has been beneficial.

Here is my simplified summary of free energy transformers:

Lenz’s law is the most important law to understand when producing free energy with simple electrical machines. If you can reduce the effects of Lenz’s law in a generator or motor, you can reduce the magnetic drag by 90% or more. When you reduce the drag, you improve efficiency.

Lenz’s law also applies to transformers. Because of Lenz's law, a  standard transformer can never produce free excess electrical  power to the secondary output. This fact is caused by the  secondary coil inducing an opposing magnetic force (opposing  flux) on the primary coil. If the primary coil has a reduced  magnetic flux, the inductance of the primary coil goes down, and  the coil begins acting more like a straight piece of wire. In a  straight piece of wire, the back EMF does not cancel the current  flowing into it like an inductor does. So as you increase load on  the secondary, an increasingly stronger opposing magnetic field  is created that prevents the primary coil from acting like a good  inductor. The more current you draw from the secondary, the  weaker the magnetic field in the transformer becomes. This  simply opens the door for more current to flow into the primary  causing heat and power loss.

If the secondary coil could receive the flux from the primary, then  you would be putting power into the secondary like normal.  However, if you could block the Lenz's law effect, you could stop  the load sensing ability of the primary. By avoiding Lenz's law, then  the secondary magnetic field would not serve to reduce the total  magnetic field of the primary. Instead, the secondary magnetic  field should be set up in a way that cannot interfere with the  primary. The secondary coil should be able to receive flux from  the primary, but it should not oppose the primary magnetic field. If  you can prevent the secondary coil's magnetic field (flux) to stay  clear of the primary's magnetic field, then the primary current will  not change in direct proportion to the load. The primary current  could be independent from the secondary load current. According  to Faraday's law of induction, you could then increase the speed  (frequency) of the magnetic field change in the primary coil,  which would induce more voltage and current into the secondary  coil. However, since the primary coil has a strong magnetic field,  and does not communicate with the secondary, very little current  will flow in the primary. As frequency increases, no extra current  is used, since the primary acts as an inductor. Yet, as frequency  increases, the secondary coil will put out more and more power.  The idea is to make the primary coil push flux into the secondary  coil, while preventing the opposing magnetic field of the  secondary to effect the primary. You need to create a magnetic  flux gate, whereby the primary field can travel to the secondary  without ever coming back. This can be accomplished by using  easily magnetized material for the secondary, and keeping the  secondary flux from escaping the secondary coil windings  (torroid core, E Core, EI core, etc. The primary coil should have  an air gap, and should be wrapped on a separate core that has  it's own flux path. This flux path should allow some of the  magnetic field to escape, so it can interact with the secondary.  However, the secondary magnetic field should not have any desire to interact back to the primary. If you use plenty of metal  on the secondary, the magnetic field will stay in the secondary. If  you use less metal on the primary, the magnetic field will escape  the primary coil, and it will create voltage and current in the  secondary. Since the primary core is smaller, and has a small air gap, the magnetic flux from the secondary has no desire to travel into the primary core.  You need to strike a balance so the primary still acts  like a good inductor, and resists current.

This is the idea behind removing Lenz's law from a transformer, and  creating free electrical power by applying Faraday's law of  induction. This applies to motors, generators and transformers. This law says you will increase the induced current  and voltage by raising the input frequency. By removing Lenz's law  from the equation, there is no relationship between the input  frequency, and the power consumption of the transformer. Yet, as  frequency increases, the induced power in the secondary coil is  increased according to Faraday's law.

[Nali2001]

Hi there,
Good to see people thinking about Lenz solutions.

Although, I must say I tried this design and most of the other "lenz stays in the 'close looped' main core' setups again and again, and the bottom line is they don't appear ever to work like we want them to be. In your example the field from the input coil will just take (under output coil load) the right hand path and avoid the left hand coil path at all. If you induce your magnetic field in an output coil to cause some induction/output going on you will create Lenz in the same coil you got your output from... So how to separate these is a mind breaker. Induction and lenz are part of the same process. And the lines of force that induce the output power are always linked to you input source like a magnet or an input coil, so they always seem to be able to trace back to the input and hinder it. If you build your setup (and p.s. if you want any power out at all, you need a secondary output coil on the right hand side of the core) you will find that once you load the output side with a 50watt bulb or something it will lenz/load your input just like any transformer.

Still looking for the real deal o.u systems myself too..
Steven

[gyulasun]

@supermuble

Maybe you have not seen this link: http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/ph-machine.htm

Basically it is the same principle you mention. And I agree with Steven's reasonings/findings.

If you assemble such a setup and say measure the self inductance of your input coil separately and then you place it into the outer closed core as you show in the drawing, you will find an increase in the inductance value. The smaller the air gap you make the higher the inductance of the input coil will be and this does indicate there is interaction between the the input and output in this setup. This is a simple but useful test for such setups for a start.

rgds,  Gyula

[DreamThinkBuild]

Excuse my ignorance on this subject, I'm still learning and reading as much as I can. Would creating the secondary coils on a wheel and the primary stationary then spin the wheel at a RPM that would be tuned 90 degrees out of phase with the secondary(s). Would this eliminate some of the EMF on the primary? Before the primary gets a chance to be affected by the counter EMF generated by the Secondary it has already moved to the next non energized coil. Timing and spacing would be critical. Just a thought.

[TechStuf]

Although, I must say I tried this design and most of the other "lenz stays in the 'close looped' main core' setups again and again, and the bottom line is they don't appear ever to work like we want them to be.

Which is why Bearden and Co. ran into such difficulty, as the scale and timing issues via their approach, require good micro engineering skill.

Would creating the secondary coils on a wheel and the primary stationary then spin the wheel at a RPM that would be tuned 90 degrees out of phase with the secondary(s

My guess DTB, is that you are not far from leveraging lenz right out of a job and sending him back to law school.


TS