Why does mass slow time?

[tournamentdan]

In physics, a force is a push or pull that can cause an object with mass to change its velocity.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force .  This is a poor definition of a force.



If I applied 5,000 lbs of pressure against you for 1/100,000 of a second, then you may live.  If I applied 5,000 lbs of pressure against you for 1 hour, then I am sure you would not survive.

If you can tell me that Time is not a force after this experiment, then I will accept it as fact.

WOW!!! That is the worst thought out of you yet. Think about this for just one second. Time is not a force especially in your comparison. The reason that you may live if you apply 5,000 lbs of pressure for 1/100,000 of a second is because the 5,000 lbs weight will not travel as far as it will in one hour. It may only move 1/100,000 of a inch which would not crush you. Please think about what you type before you type it.

[newbie123]

Newb, this is a scientific type forum so physics is a hot topic

PYRO,

I suggest you go read the definition of scientific  and then think about it..... This forum is absolutely not scientific at all in general.

but you got to admit 10000s of physicists agree that overunity is impossible, but here you are and here I am and all the others, going against a lot of proved physics...

Isn't nuclear fusion considered overunity?   And all scientists recognize this...     But magnet motors & gravity wheels  are considered myths and BS for good reason.... 

[PYRODIN123321]

â€"adjective 1. of or pertaining to science or the sciences: scientific studies. (yes)
2. occupied or concerned with science: scientific experts.  (maybe)
3. regulated by or conforming to the principles of exact science: scientific procedures.  (ehhh no..)
4. systematic or accurate in the manner of an exact science (also ehhh...no)

lol, I kinda agree, not much method to the madness....

[PYRODIN123321]

Also overunity is kinda a bad term for this stuff anyway, you can only achieve overunity if your doing your math wrong or you have some energy source that's unaccounted for, and that's what we are looking for really...

[newbie123]

Also overunity is kinda a bad term for this stuff anyway, you can only achieve overunity if your doing your math wrong or you have some energy source that's unaccounted for, and that's what we are looking for really...

Really what you guys are trying to do is disprove the most solid, proven and tested physics theories out there...   Which is fine, imo, but the chances of doing this are so slim it's not even funny.... 

Many, many, experiments have been done by professional scientists in multi million dollar labs, and every once in a while, they'll find a scientific anomaly... And document it the best they can...  I don't think E=mc^2 as ever been found to be flawed.

So, if you were to somehow create energy without nuclear reactions..  You would most likely be creating matter out of thin air (and showing at least 4 fundamental physics theories are seriously flawed at the same)..

It's funny though...    Assuming one of the many FE devices talked about here really works,  the chances that they're doing a nuclear reaction is millions, billions, even trillions times more likely than a "new energy source" ...  And why everyone chooses to overlook well known science (or think it's a big conspiracy) is a mystery to me..