Why does mass slow time?

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Photons, and everything else, like planets, try to go where time is least. Gravity curves spacetime because the photons or anything that has mass are seeking or are pulled toward a path of least time, which is a path of more gravity. Physicists have proven with atomic clocks and satellites that gravity slows time. Clocks run slower at lower altitudes where gravity is stronger. Time is least (flows more slowly) where gravity is most.

The earth orbiting the sun has momentum which keeps it in orbit. If the earth's momentum were to stop, the earth would seek the path of least time, and be pulled straight into the sun! It would not follow a curved path to the sun if it does not have momentum.

1) Mass causes gravity.
2) Mass seeks or is pulled where time is least.
3) The larger the mass, the least time is.
4) spacetime is curved to the curvature of the mass.
5) Without mass, time is not curved.
6) Without momentum near a mass, space is not curved.

Einstein said as you approach the speed light time slows down and mass increases. This also holds true for a black hole, because of its mass, time slows as one accelerates toward the event horizon and time stops at the event horizon. The reason why time slows down as you approach the speed of light is because the mass increases(More mass means less time). The question I have is why does mass slow time, or is my thinking curved also, lol?

Hi GravityBlock.

is there something else I can call you?

I wanted to express why an object seeks the path of least resistance, it's called the conservation of matter and energy, it is what makes perpetual motion impossible, Matter is Lazy by Nature unless it is an unstable Isotope which generally comes in different flavors of radioactive properties. but even they have half lives, the least amount of half life the more dangerous it is per category of radioactive classification.

I may be an Atheist, I believe in only Science and Physics and observed facts, I say, I will never neglect your faith in a God no matter how much it doesn't make sense.  really, your God is like a Science to me, if the One God exposes him or her self to me I will study with all my hearts content. whether they are truly Godly or truly Alien by nature. I know by the laws of nature that we as a race are 1 in 1 billionth in univeral intelligence, how far up that level is what God is? just so you know, it is possible for a race of beings to know everything just like God. if you don't believe me then shame on you and not your God because that is the way things work.

Jerry

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Hi GravityBlocker.

When you are admonished with trying to explain your God, I will reveal something no other person has known, not even religious even thought I could make it so. they may say so but there has never been another. do you know that the future is true and the past is true but the present is not, can you figure that one out.

[gravityblock]

Hi GravityBlocker.

When you are admonished with trying to explain your God, I will reveal something no other person has known, not even religious even thought I could make it so. they may say so but there has never been another. do you know that the future is true and the past is true but the present is not, can you figure that one out.

You can call me GB if you like.

The last post I mentioned about God in this thread was 6 months ago.  This is when the thread died.  This is not the place for it, but I lose my mind from time to time.

Maybe you will be so kind to share with us this answer along with revealing something that no other person has known, and save me a lot of wasted time following mis-truths, half-truths, misinformation, etc. and losing half of my sanity in the process of the OU quest.

I have a feeling what you may reveal, is going to try and deny the existence of God.  Although you said you wasn't going to make it religious, so this will be interesting if you decide to reveal it.  If you must, then say what you have to say.  I will try to hold my tongue, but I can make no promises.

You have a right to express your thoughts as I have.  So don't hold back.  I will give you the same respect as you have given me.


Thanks,

GB

[gravityblock]

Hi GravityBlock.

I wanted to express why an object seeks the path of least resistance, it's called the conservation of matter and energy, it is what makes perpetual motion impossible, Matter is Lazy by Nature unless it is an unstable Isotope which generally comes in different flavors of radioactive properties. but even they have half lives, the least amount of half life the more dangerous it is per category of radioactive classification.

Jerry

Why can't the path of least resistance be where time is least?  If time causes particles and matter to experience resistance, then wouldn't the particles go where time is least, which would be the path of least resistance?  If not, then please tell me what is the path of least resistance for the particles and matter instead of stating this without defining what the path of least resistance is.  All you have done is quoted from the physics books without even considering what the path of least resistance may be.

I won't accept that the mass of an object is the path of least resistance for another mass that is approaching, which is total nonsense.  Mass takes time away or converts time into a force or energy from the vacuum of space in and around it's vicinity and this is what holds the mass together and what is responsible for the space-time curvature.  This is also true for what is holding the individual atoms together. Thus an approaching object will follow towards the larger mass due to less time in the vicinity of the mass that was taken away by the mass in order to hold the mass together, which would be less resistance.

Why won't people even consider that Time may be gravity and that Space may be an abundance of Time?   Nobody can fully grasp time and nobody can fully grasp gravity.  Maybe Space, Time, and Gravity are all the same.  At least entertain the notion.

The Conservation of Matter and Energy  <---- Always being thrown at OU and to say something is impossible.  This is the statement used when physics has no other answer.  LOL

The impossible is proven to be possible time after time in physics and in many cases without even needing to change or modify the theory or law that said it was impossible to begin with.

I refuse to believe that perpetual motion is impossible.  The entire universe is in perpetual motion.

Physics said the Quasi-crystal was impossible, but is now proven.

Airplanes were said to be impossible to fly at one time.

Physics at one point couldn't understand how the bumble bee could fly.

Just because something is believed to be impossible with the current ideas of the time, doesn't mean it is impossible. 

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Sorry GB, I got smashed last night and I apologize for saying some things that I shouldn't of expressed.

Jerry