Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



locating Steve Mark´s TPU demonstration house

Started by EMdevices, November 22, 2008, 09:00:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

BEP

In the late 80's I heard there were transmission (power line) experiments at 400 Hz. This required the use of motor-generator sets. Last I heard the costs were too high and the tests were limited to large military bases. I know we packaged very large 400 Hz diesel generators that had the added value of variable frequency for an Air Force base. They were likely used as a central power source for multiple aircraft.

I can see no way frequency change alone could bring any value to this concept. The thought that any portion of the grid was running at a different frequency seems possible but not likely at all. How could a 60Hz and another frequency system be coupled at such high voltages and power levels?

Stepping voltage up and down is common but frequency? Sure, it can be done at small power levels even without active devices but high power? That would be a great breakthrough alone.

Mannix

Quote from: Neolystic on November 23, 2008, 03:26:09 PM
Since this thread is completely off the rails anyway, I'll throw one more thing out as food for thought.  I mentioned at one time that there was part of my theory of TPU operation that, to my knowledge, had not been considered previously.  One thing that keeps sticking in my mind is that during some of his tests, Tesla said he was 'creating electrons'.  No doubt statements like this only added to the ridicule heaped upon him.  However, I believe he was right.  How could electrons be 'created'?  With muons.  Think about it.  Muons come flying in from space at faster-than-light velocities.  This is proven by their speed measurements and resulting time-dilation.  They come in from all different angles and at all different speeds.  As they slow down, they break down into a photon, and electron!! and other quantum particles.  Muons are the most highly-concentrated non-atomic particle at sea level.  Normally they have to go at least 60 feet underground before they break down into an electron, photon, etc.  However, if there were a way to slow them down enough so the breaking-down occurred, for example, above a TPU (say by a dielectric field expanding, X-number of times per second, at faster-than-light velocities), then if there was an absence of electrons in a collector coil, because the electrons normally in the wire were at that moment pushed out away from the wire, then one could capture these newly-created electrons in that vacuum.  Kinetic energy from the speed of the muons themselves would be transferred to the dielectric field, causing it to collapse with more force than it expanded with.  After the muon deteriorated into its component parts, we would gain an electron, as well as the energy from the newly-created photon.

Some things support this theory.  I think it's no accident that Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower had a grounding plane that went several hundred feet into the ground.  If he were trying to capture muons as they converted into an electron, photon, etc., it could be done most effectively at a depth of 60 feet or more.  The second thing that I believe supports this idea is that the Muon-G experiments determined that 225 Khz was the most effective frequency with which to capture muons, given the magnetic field strength that they were using.  As I recall, SM said something once about how hard it would be to find the frequencies AND voltages....not just frequencies.  He also mentioned that his tube amp would go up to 245 khz maximum, so it's in the same general range.  To effectively capture muons, one would need the right magnetic field strength (determined by voltage), as well as the right frequency (which would determine how many times/sec the incoming muons were 'pushed against' by the expanding dielectric field in order to slow them down and keep them in the area so that when they broke down, the muon components would be in the area, ready to be harvested.  Too strong a mag field, or too many pulses/sec would push the components away, and too weak of either would let them fly right on by into the earth.

This is VERY VERY interesting  I had not seen this before. It does need it own thread
Thank you for your positive input

Lindsay

Neolystic

Thanks @Lindsay for your compliment.  Muon harvest is one of 3 working theories that I'm currently working to prove or disprove.  The reason you haven't seen the muon theory anywhere else is that, as far as i know, it's entirely my own, and now I'm giving it out to the public domain.  The test I outlined above is designed to filter out any external influences except for muons, Earth's mag field, and the aether.  I've also written up my aether theory but haven't posted it because it's based entirely on the bible.  I thought it'd be best to start out with the parts that would cause the fewest possible number of people to label me as crazy and move up from there lol. In any case, each test run will take several days to complete, so I'll start a new thread as soon as I have something tangible to post, besides theory.

giantkiller

Even simpler...
Since the distance from the wires wouldnt enable any appreciable power harvest, the devices could simply work off of 60hz resonance. The ringing goes so much farther in time and distance. I had posted 2 years ago that the SM17 could be a receiver / transmitter and that the SM4 & 6 could be receivers.

The line towers will actually ring the Earth. The crystaline structure of the marble floor in the house would also see that.

Now is it illegal to harvest the ringing from the power company? Plug in a microwatt 60hz oscillator in an outlet farthest away from the junction box and the whole circuit leg will be alive. That makes it a transmitter. The receiving device is a loosely coupled air inductor. Match the load and you have power to drive. In others words, don't match the wattage in and out. Simply match the resonance.

Wth power lines that close SM paid too much for the property. I don't and never will live next to things like that.

--giantkiller. Simply Tesla. Still is.

innovation_station

KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID!!!!   LOL

perhaps this is where sm went WRONG!!  :D


lol

all the good stuff comes form the same place ......

ist

1 freq 2 freq 3 freq....  20 ferq   IT DONT  FREQ 'IN MATTER   lol 


you want to do somthing USEFUL.... post wire lengths.......  tuned
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!