Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[CrazyFox]

@Sparks

Only a few inventors were privy to this plasma concept. Viktor Schauberger, Samuel Clemens, and Marconi apart from Tesla. The idea could not be comprehended by others of their day. The thermo-electrostatic oil shear combined with the water capacitor in the oil water emulsion is a tremendous source of power as demonstraited in the Richard Clem Device. When scaled up and put in tandem with a superconducting motor/generator of the Lorentz field coil type (American Super Conductor) a very attractive energy option will be available. I am an analyst of this kind of power. Rf field MHD flying machines and  submarines are another focus of my analysis. Unfortunately, the government influenced by corporate greed, tries to dead file such research under the guise of National Security. That works until the competing world powers duplicate or recalculate the seed idea to maturity. The usual time required from seed idea to maturity is about a year. Much "Classified Information" has this same time line to disclosure.
One overriding question is.....if we are so damn smart, why is the world so screwed up?

[jwk]

Way to ruin an interesting thread. 

[Cap-Z-ro]

Actually I find the whole thread very interesting and thought provoking.

I wood like to add that in my mind it appears things on this planet are influenced by convergent forces from within and without.

Regards...

[Grumpy]

This is an unusual situation in that I don't really have to build a device since every free energy device is the testbed.

Take for example the Papp engine. Where is the cavitation?

The high voltage arc is a cavitation and when that gas in the cylinder is cavitation with an arc, it transmutes. They have video of the process which is fairly well understood.

there are tons of examples out there. What people need to learn is what cavitation is and the various forms it takes. In the past they have created all kinds of silly answers for how these devices work and that disinfo. makes them impossible to understand and replicate.

Not all arcs are cavitations.  It must be a quenched arc - abruptly switched on and off.   You will not get the goods with any ol' arc.  I have found that it takes a lot of air to equal what a magnet can do...then there is what the arc is connected to.  Not just any ol' circuit will work.  Coils of high self-inductance are required in some devices - just an arbitrary mass will not work.

One problem is that most purported OU devices use "things" that the builder does/did not fully understand and therefore they have "issues" - Sweet's VTA for example, Bearden's MEG, SM's TPU - even Tesla had issues with his magnifiers.  When time of day becomes an issue, you need to take a good look at the universe.

A second problem is that most purported OU devices are not well documented.   

[sparks]

     Ionization of a gas can lead to a plasma that becomes selfconfined.  The  magnetic fields associated with the electron flow about the ionized core and the loss of Brownian interatomic field polarization can cause the ions to organize into a plasma.  Tesla was good at this.  I believe he was good enough at building selfconfined plasma to make either a plasmafield about a space or a directed plasma field death ray.  The plasma can be caused to grow such that the radiation from this field results in ionization of gas at the end of the plasma tunnel and adoption of the electron mass into the confining current.  Any number of frequencies could be employed to cause a longitudinal wave through the plasma to emit a frequency that would promote ionization of the gas at the end of the tunnel.  Or in Hutchinson's case delamination of metals etc.