MAGNACOASTER MAKES THE DRAGONS DEN!!

[TinselKoala]

Phone call to the department secretary at U. of W. :

"Hi there, I'm TinselKoala, maybe you've heard of me, the Evil Skeptic? I'd like to get some more information about the research your department did on behalf of Richard Willis, dba MagnaCoaster. This is in regard to due diligence wrt an investment I'm thinking about making. Could you please refer me to the researcher who did the work for Magnacoaster?"
"What's that? You've been getting calls all week, and you haven't any idea what it's about?"
"I see. I'll try the engineering department, then. Thanks--cheery-bye."

Perhaps I'll make the call this afternoon...

[wattsup]

For the DragDen investors, when your tax situation is bigger then your net returns, giving a million dollars for 50% of a corporation is great because if it works, it will return tremendously, and if it does not, the investors will have 1 million dollars of capital in the corporation that when closed will allow them to write it off in tax credits of 50%, or, they can always use the company in another business model to generate enough profit to pay themselves back completely. So they gave a million, but it actually cost them 500,000$. And this capital that they will put in will not be registered under magnacoaster's personal name but in the investors name (lol). So if it fails, Mag loses all and these guys lose 1/2. But they would have paid that much I taxes anyways. But that is only the financial side for investors and does not really worry me.

What worries me is the fact that for anyone to have ONE working OU device would already be a definite one in a million event, as he showed and claimed with his motor/alternator set-ups, then to junk that and make an about face and develop a totally solid state device that is also OU. Typical fraud tactics if you ask me. Just wait, once the heat starts building on him, he will come up with another device. He is asking 50% down payment. That's the money model. Pay half now and wait for life. lol

But what kills me is his "claim" of UofW doing tests and showing the device consumes 18 watts and puts out 50kwatts. What is he talking about? Does he think people are that stupid? So how was the 50kwatts served. 120 volts @ 416 amps, 240 volts @ 208 amps, 460 volts @ 108 amps, 1000 volts at 50 amps, 5000 volts @ 10 amps. How the hell was it served on the output side. Now let me ask this next question. Do you realize that at any of the above servings, the circuits involved just to switch the unit off would be twice as big as his unit. Can you imagine the infrastructure on the output side required. That box and all its wires would have fried a chicken is two seconds flat.

Then the next question to ask is, OK, what was the load. What did you plug into this device to measure 50kwatts output. Let me guess. A fully loaded 76hp electric motor. Yeh sure.

There was nothing there then, there is nothing here now, there will be nothing there tomorrow. This is the slogan he should use for his company. The only thing I can see from this is he is a totally delusional and pathological liar. End of story. Hmmmmmm. No where did I see this before?????????

My most puzzling and last question is, why the hell did I waste 10 minutes writing this? lol
Back to work......the show is over.
Let's make it real.

[Ergo]

Best statement ever.....you rule wattsup.

Another things is....2600% on 18W = 468W output, not 50KW
His lie about 18W in and 50KW output should compute to 277777% overunity.
This nails it. He can't count and his numbers are just to crazy.

[BEP]

Do you realize that at any of the above servings, the circuits involved just to switch the unit off would be twice as big as his unit. Can you imagine the infrastructure on the output side required. That box and all its wires would have fried a chicken is two seconds flat.

I agree with most of what you say but don't let the above make you lean either way.
Controlling power to a load is as simple as controlling the field in the generator.

Example: I've worked with 750kW Kato generators that only required field power of less than 500 watts. Switch the field off and nothing goes to the load. Vary that field and control the voltage, therefore the power, going to that same load. (Residual field magnetism is usually too weak to drive a sizable load. Voltage can drop to zero without field drive. Then you need to flash the field or bump it with a magnet to get it going again.)

About like I see Tesla's electric car. Two carbon contact rods vary grid bias on two of three beam power tetrodes (one is left biased for full output while idling) and the three half-wave rectifiers were there to provide the DC drive voltage from the three phase output of the generator portion.

If the 'motor' in that car was a combination motor-generator (40 inches long? Jeez!) AND that motor portion's field voltage was controlled by these tubes AND the generator portion was configured to avoid the bad aspects of Lenz's law.... Well, lets just leave it there. All Tesla or this guy would need to do is give it an initial spin.

If this guy has something real then it is a repeat find of Tesla's electric jalopy.

I'm waiting for him to disappear completely. Then I'll know he was no fake.

[Albert Johnson]

Interesting article:

http://www.financialpost.com/small_business/story.html?id=1076840