What if the textbooks are right?

[CARN0T]

thanks for your honest and candid answer ernie. what would be the best place to stay up to date on your project, this thread or your blog?

Hello, Wilby,

I will make a promise that when I update my blog on this, I will post a notice here.  So, I think this group is the best place to keep in touch.

Ernie Rogers

[Creativity]

@CARNOT
untill now i also assume textbooks right,untill not proven otherwise.Sill it does not block my mind to allow more exotic approaches.
Indeed,improving of efficiency is the everyday battle worth playing.Many people on this forum agrees on that ( i have a feeling based on posts i read here everyday).
From personal experience,IC is quite complex to work on and asks for some good understanding across different fields in physics.Others already pointed out some problems u may face,i will add an increased heat flux through combustion chamber walls and cylinder wall.In order to keep materials not overstressed , u will have to increase cooling(implying higher heat loses).

[magifesq]

WOW 40:1 compression ratio - you may want to consider water injection to help reduce the chances of detonation. 
Are you familiar with a Pantone 'GEET' device - it may help in reducing the operating temperature, and also help with the efficiencies.
I wish you best of luck.

My personal project for the past 5-6 years has been creating a clean burning 2 stroke engine.  I started with consulting a few engineers sympathetic to the cause and willing to help guide me in my designs.  Right about the time I was ready to commit funds to purchasing raw materials to build the top end out of, I stumbled upon a different approach - clean burning fuels and now I'm following up on that angle. 
One clean burning fuel in particular is Hydrogen from water.  I've been working on a hydrogen fuel cell system for the past couple years and when I'm done I can't wait to bring the final product to the EPA and show them a clean burning 2 stroke.  I just love the 2 stroke engine dynamics and would like to find a way to save it and keep green at the same time.

Again best of luck.

[magifesq]

Here's another thought - what if the text books are right in so far as laboratory science?
When I think of my textbooks for High School and College - the chemistry and physics textbooks were replications of experiments done in laboratory conditions, controlled conditions, with controlled factors.
I've observed many engineers and scientists rely solely upon the textbooks for their reasoning.  Many refuse over unity concepts because they involve factors and variables that do not conform to traditional textbook approaches.

I've been told by more than a few educated people that hydrogen on demand from electrolysis will not produce enough fuel to run a vehicle - it will not work and that it would require too much energy (which I've often asked how much energy just to receive a blank stare).  I have a hard time accepting that answer due to the Stan Myers, Bob Boyces, and others who have done already it. 

[DreamThinkBuild]

There is always a possibility of overlooked abnormalities.

"...It is surprising and delightful that comparatively large relativity violations could still be awaiting discovery despite a century of precision testing..."

"Possible Abnormality In Fundamental Building Block Of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090105150837.htm