Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?

[ramset]

Grumpy
thank you for that responce
I sincerely appreciate that info

Buzz
Odd how you were just reading something directly related to Grumpy's post

I personally don't think I can put into words how I feel about the work you are doing [and your personal sacrafice]
   
      Chet

[Grumpy]

Grumpy,

Interesting post. I just got done scanning through some Smith stuff I found here:

http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/newsci.htm

Smith and I could have hung. One of the first quotes that popped out at me is "The Universe contains no anomalies, and the appearance of an anomaly is warning that our understanding is inadequate."

He nailed that one. This is why I say things like "plasma is not a state of matter, it is matter in a state of change" and... If a law of physics has an exception, it is not a law, just a handy rule.

And law of physics that does not include a quantum component like (E=MC2) is just a rule. This is why the law of force can be violated (F=MA) Where is the time squared. The law itself is just a label for future use in a math equation, math equations designed dovetail into the descriptions of apples falling from trees, steam and fire.

These false law of physics were never updated when new information came along for a variety of reasons. One of which is you don't change science, you just wait for the dinosaurs to die and create a new breed of scientist. That new breed is growing up now in an era of thousands of cold fusion replications that can not be denied.

Yes, several physics laws have been corrected, expanded, or clarified.  For example the infamous "conservation of charge" does not apply to currents that do not have a "net charge", such as polarization currents, displacement currents, and magnetic currents.  Also, when using impulses, "conservation of energy" does not apply.  This changes the playing field considerably.

Another example would be Planks constant - "The speed of light in a vacuum is constant." It has always been assumed that space is a vacuum, only problem is that that vacuum is filled with charged quadrapoles such as out Sun. When light passes near a charged quadrapole, it slows down considerably. The result is the size of the universe once claimed just got a lot smaller.

Cosmologists would make that information public but imagine the paperwork that would result. Students that cling to the willful ignorance of their belief based education would begin to ask question and think. Couldn't have have now could we? Some of them might begin ask questions like "Is a free energy device possible?"

I too have a few experiences up close with antigravity scapecraft as close as 50 feet away and information exchanges between myself and they and have physical evidence of that. Not ever going to go into details but it is fair to say that shaped some of my thoughts regarding religion and science.

Our astro-nots got one hell of a surprise when they went to the moon.  It is small, and there is spacial aberation making men standing on the moon appear huge to the man in the space capsule above them - pretty wierd.  Then there were the structures on the dark side, and they switched to code talk.

Alternative energy devices are very possible and more than one approach will get you there.  You can take the Wilbert
Smith approach and manipulate the tempic field, or you can describe all of it as patterns in the aether, or twist the hell out of Maxwell's work, or you can approach it via cavitation which is easier to understand.  How or why can be figured out after it works.

The iron core is safe to play with since all your are going to do if you go OU is destroy a power supply or any electronics used in the device. The mechanical aspect of the motor produces a time lag for things to get controlled by you or fly apart if you go OU and this is also good.

This is why I like Thanes generator but wouldn't give you two cents for the inventor. I have been working on this lately and trust me, there is a lot of room for improvement if the cavitation information is applied.

I see he is now talking about producing data points and using smaller wire to predict better methods rather than winding another 1000 coils all the while bad mouthing me and posting senseless information about a thyristor.(like I don't know what it is or what it does.) That being said, I do wish him good luck, with his development methods, he depends on it.
The non-linear gain that I noted in my first coil should have been a blinking light to anyone interested in that device. Resonance is going to be one key aspect to high efficiency and there will be others such as coil winding methods - working on that now.

You could shape the HV coil like a cone and change the action of the spring.

=====================================================================================

Man made?

Not likely.

[mscoffman]

An Interesting Cavitation show-and-tell from a fluid valve manufacturer;

http://www.emersonprocess.com/fisher/products/severeservice/product_solutions/cavitation_demo/

---

Cavitation and Fusion Energy
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRcavitationb.pdf

http://sonofusionjets.com/


:S:MarkSCoffman

[Frederic2k1]

@ TheBuzz and all the other

I have a (for me) very important question. So when I understand the process of cavitation correct, we are only "destroying" matter to convert it into energy? Is that right ? So when we start the process of cavitation in a body, we can notice a loss in weight of this body ?

Sorry, I'm from Germany and my english is only based on bad school english...

Please, can you explain this sentence for me a bit more:

every verified free energy device used cavitation to convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass

What do you mean with "contained within the mass" ... ?

Thank you
kind regards

[wings]

An Interesting Cavitation show-and-tell from a fluid valve manufacturer;

http://www.emersonprocess.com/fisher/products/severeservice/product_solutions/cavitation_demo/

---

Cavitation and Fusion Energy
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRcavitationb.pdf

http://sonofusionjets.com/


:S:MarkSCoffman

see also this:

PINCHED CAVITATION JETS AND FUSION EVENTS

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StringhamRpinchedcav.pdf