Fusionchip's Bedini Feedback to Source!!!

gadgetmall · February 11, 2009, 01:07:20 AM

Quote from: Hoppy on February 09, 2009, 03:39:19 PM
gadgetmall

I did try another coil but the loading stopped oscillation.

I have tried again with your latest circuit showing the rather strange 'reversed' diode on the transistor base and it does oscillate under certain conditions but still no battery charging is evident. I've also tried it the conventional way round and it still does not charge. If you are really are charging a battery to a decent voltage then you really do have something special here. How long does it take to add 0.1V to the battery voltage from just after you dump the cap and can you take your battery right up to fully charged above 14V? Also, what frequency is your circuit oscillating at after cap dump?

Hoppy

Im not that great in math these days . at 5:35 am my wet cell test battery was 10.09 volts at 10:00 pm it was 13.08 . can you figure a rate of charge . i cant say about the frequency as i did this test without the cap so it was spinning very very slow and just the tinyest squeak .. It is a sweetspot and the next one is going to have another 10 turn pot on it will do that fine adjustment .

Hoppy · February 11, 2009, 10:10:02 AM

Quote from: gadgetmall on February 11, 2009, 01:07:20 AM
Im not that great in math these days . at 5:35 am my wet cell test battery was 10.09 volts at 10:00 pm it was 13.08 . can you figure a rate of charge . i cant say about the frequency as i did this test without the cap so it was spinning very very slow and just the tinyest squeak .. It is a sweetspot and the next one is going to have another 10 turn pot on it wo do that fine adjustment .

Hi Gadgetmall

That's very impressive! Have you thought about enetreing for the OU prize on this forum?

Hoppy

gadgetmall · February 11, 2009, 10:53:37 AM

Quote from: Hoppy on February 11, 2009, 10:10:02 AM
Hi Gadgetmall

That's very impressive! Have you thought about enetreing for the OU prize on this forum?

Hoppy

Its mostly John bedinis circuit . I don't need a copywriter lawsuit

It would be all over the energetic fourm and He has enuff money he would sue me ... . Believe me i thought about it ..and itmakes me wonder why Bedini himself hasn't Claimed the prize . HMMM.. MIB o yeah .

Hoppy · February 11, 2009, 12:14:27 PM

Quote from: gadgetmall on February 11, 2009, 10:53:37 AM
Its mostly John bedinis circuit . I don't need a copywriter lawsuit It would be all over the energetic fourm and He has enuff money he would sue me ... . Believe me i thought about it ..and itmakes me wonder why Bedini himself hasn't Claimed the prize . HMMM.. MIB o yeah .

He's first got to prove it to everyone and that's very difficult if other people can't get his design working OU for themselves.

Hoppy

plengo · February 13, 2009, 11:32:57 AM

I have been trying every single possible combination on this self-runner with varied results. I can make it run extremely economical, even though it is using 20ma the battery thinks I am using only 5ma, which means I can extend the run-time to 4x.

I have not succesfully made a self-runner YET but I think I understand (if gadgetmall is being honest and accurate, which I think he is) how this could possibly work.

Below are two pictures of the circuit, the first is gadgetmall design and the second is how I see it. You will notice that on the second circuit you will see basically two LC circuits that are only sharing the negative of the battery and they are mutally inducing to each other a resonance. Each LC (the one on the left and the one on the right) are also exclusively in resonance if the correct parameters are chosen. Once they are both in resonance and mutually affecting each other the whole circuit becomes a resonant LC circuit (LC3).

Once that LC3 (the whole circuit) is in resonance it will cost the battery very little to run it and that is in line with my data during my tests. Also notice that picture of the scope shots. They are showing two waves from two probes, one probe on the base of C1 and the other probe on the anode of the diode D2. They are showing (at least in my non-expert eletronics view) two almost identical signals but inverted from each other or in reciprocity. This makes me believe that when LC on the left is running to its maximum the LC on the right it is also running to its maximum but with opposite sign, therefore conserving the total energy of the system (as one would expect from an resonant circuit).

But now notice the spikes on the end of each wave, they are 300v spikes (when the the capacitor C2 is not in use). I think those are the free elements of the whole process because they ARE the radiant spikes (as Bedini says) and they are created during the collapsing of the magnetic field in the coils of the fan. They are not BEMF only. Those are free (we did not pay for it) and they are the ones that charges the Lead Acid battery (as Bedini said it again) when the "special diode" D3 is used, because D3 will force that radiant energy to go to the battery only.

Therefore it is possible, at least in my humble theory, to run this circuit in resonance and self-running mode as gadgetmall claims. If I am right I think the next approach is to increase the number os those spikes while continuing to maintain the resonance of all three LCs circuits (the one on the left and right and the third being the whole circuit).

What do you guys think?

Fausto.