Newsflash: Overunity is impossible

[Yucca]

I see the term overunity as a nice tag for alternative free energy schemes. And it holds true to a certain extent when the the energy comes from a source unknown or discredited by the mainstream books. Because when the system is drawn on paper and all of it´s accepted system boundaries are taken into consideration then it will indeed appear to be OU.

Of course full analysis and understanding of any OU phenomena will reveal the source of the energy.
But until the actual energy source and transfer mechanism are understood, which could take many years after the phenomena  is discovered, OU seems a reasonable term to me.

So in summary, I see OU as a similar label to UFO. It´s like saying this thing provides power but nobody is really sure where it´s coming from, it seems to be doing something magical.

Griggs hydrosonic pump is one device I would call OU.

[z.monkey]

THE EARTH IS FLAT. Period.
huhhh. damn. I have set my time machine to the wrong century.
In a hundred years, humankind will (re)name OverUnity as "COMMON PHYSICS".

ã"ã,"にちは、真実はでã,ã,‹å...¨ããƒ•ã,£ã,¯ã,·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã,ˆã,Šå¥‡å¦™â€¦

Edit, well my Japanese didn't work out as I would have liked...

What it should read is:  Hello, Truth is stranger than fiction...

Oh, Well!

[z.monkey]

Yeah, and how does the seed grow into a plant? Through SUNLIGHT (a source of energy) and WATER (another source of energy).. NO OVERUNITY!!!

Well, I am glad that you have appointed yourself the grand overdenyer of OU, your highness...

Stephan, OUers, looks like Newsflash has just burst the bubble for everyone...

Might as well rip down overunity.com, and call all our efforts pointless and futile...

Might as well trash all our dreams and aspirations, because Newsflash has it ALL figured out...

Looks like I might as well quit science and go get a job at the Clown Burger Restaurant...

Thanks Newsflash! I don't know what I would have done without your Revelations...

[tinu]

@ The Observer,

Come on now, observer. I’ve seen a much better understanding on your side in many previous posts. But the guitar example is childish and wrong.
A guitar body is called an "amplifier" for obvious historical and apparent reasons: when employed, sound hears much louder. But it is mere a mechanic-acoustic converter (pretty much like the membrane of any speaker). The bare sting vibrates but due to its shape is not appropriate for passing its energy into the air at a high enough rate hence the sound is not very loud. The body of the guitar (as well as of other musical string instruments) does exactly that: converts the mechanical energy of the string into acoustical energy. If your goal when playing guitar is to heat the room, it doesn’t matter if you use the resonating body or not. Nonetheless, energy is the same with or without it. No OU.

Cheers,
Tinu

[sushimoto]

こんにちは、真実はである全くフィクションより奇妙…

Edit, well my Japanese didn't work out as I would have liked...

What it should read is:  Hello, Truth is stranger than fiction...

Oh, Well!

YEAH *LOL*

We both agree.

Thanks Newsflash! I don't know what I would have done without your Revelations...

So lets call it "Conversation of Energy" instead of "Conservation of Energy"