Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

Started by Magnethos, February 02, 2009, 08:37:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Koen1

Just for informational purposes, that "energy from thin air" circuit
is in fact the "Tate Ambient Power Module" as described in detail,
incl patent, on the pages of http://www.rexresearch.com/tate/tate.htm

Not that that changes the fact that you can use it to get a little bit
of power from random radio waves of course.
But I like to call things by the name and not adopt some youtube users
self-invented video title instead. But that's just me. ;)

@Magnethos: I do not entirely follow how your three steps constitute a theory of free energy.
Can you please explain it a bit more?
So we use 1) a voltage source to 2) pulse charge capacitors and then 3) use a capacitor bank
to add the charges of many caps together....
I don't really see where the free energy part comes in...
Sure, if the voltage source is a free source, then obviously you could charge as many caps
as you like with it if the source can deliver that amount of charge.
But that will still only give as output exactly the amount of energy put in...
Or is your entire point that there are charges hat can be freely collected from the environment
and stored in caps, charges that do not need to come out of the wall socket or a battery...
... is that your point? I don't think so, I think your trying to point out something else, but
I am not sure. Hence the request for further explanation of your theory there. :)

regards,
Koen

Magnethos

@Koen1

I mean we can replace a battery and use an 'antenna'. The antenna has infinite potential, but the battery sometimes discharges its power. Of course, maybe you need years, but in the end the battery discharges.

So, we can use an antenna to get voltage. Then we use the switch circuit to switch on/off very fast (remember that the effect is higher while current doesn't saturates the circuit). One time we've drawed pure voltage throuth the circuit and the caps are charged. Then we can discharge the caps, using any device. A light bulb, a motor...
The free energy comes when we repeat this proces again and again. Look at the picture to get an idea. But the picture isn't the same schematic that I have posted. But the idea is:
1. Charge the caps
2. Discharge to a load
3. Repeat the process very fast.

Of course, we need to know if we can charge a capacitor bank at the same time. For that reason we need to perform some tests. But the theory is this.

NRGFromTheVacuum

Hi everyone,

I thought this picture was interesting because it shows both the input spike from the battery/capacitor and the input spike from the local vacuum.

The oscilloscope is set to 5 volts per division at 250ms.

NRGFromTheVacuum

Here is a Gif image I made from the video. It shows the current entering the coil. Then after the current leaves the coil, the energy ends up in the 30uF capacitor.

http://www.gifninja.com/Workspace/a699cce1-eb9f-4f73-8483-196c8a9229ae/output.gif

Koen1

@Magnethos: Ok, thanks for running that by me again.
So what you're saying is that we can perform that fast-switching trick
and do what Bearden described in that example animation, but
contrary to what Bearden says we do not need to use a special
degenerate conductor with a long relaxation time to make it work?
As long as we just switch things fast enough, we should be able
to get out more than we put in.
Did I understand you correctly now?

Seems to me that this depends on what Bearden calls the steepness of the
potential gradient. That's the sharp rise in potential we see in that sawtooth wave.
Bearden repeatedly refers to such sharp gradients as "breaking the local symmetry",
which in his terminology results in "negative energy spikes". Which are of an energy
form that can be transduced into positive energy, and that can power our devices.

This theory seems to accord with the high potential spikes measured in Bedini's motors,
and it also seems to accord with that scope pic posted by NRGfromtheVacuum above.

So I guess what I'm saying is, it sounds interesting, it sounds like what Bearden has been
saying for years, it sounds like what Bedini manages to do, and in that it is fascinating.

If you have some more detailed schematics on the actual circuit needed to do this
extremely fast switching trick, so we can build it and see if we do indeed get more out than we put in,
then please post them? I for one would like to see them, and I suspect there's others that
would like to see them too. :)

Regards,
Koen