Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[Magnethos]

Thanks very much Frederick 

I haven't seen a graph of an high-inductive coil.
About the Peter's book, I have heard about it but I haven't read it.


So, if I use this schematic... I would be extracting pure potential from the battery.
Schematic explanation:
A battery is connected to the high-inductive coils, 2, so the saturation-time is more than 1 msec.
The capacitor bank is controled by a switch. In the first cycle the cap bank is conected to the source (and NOT to the load, device, etc...) to get the pure potential and in the second cycle the cap bank is connected to the load and NOT to the source. In the second cycle the load gets the energy stored in the caps. And then we need to repeat these 2 cycles again and again.

You said that using some High-Inductive Coils we can get pure potential from the battery. I think using 2 is high enough to increase the saturation time and we will be able to get only pure potential from the source and charge the caps.

Am I right or not about the theory? I see this experiment extremely easy to be true. For that reason I ask to you..

[Frederic2k1]

You said that using some High-Inductive Coils we can get pure potential from the battery.

No, you misunderstood me a bit at this point. There will always be some current, not only voltage. I think to get pure potential we have to deal with very short duration switching and very high-inductive coils, but you get the point.

About the Peter's book, I have heard about it but I haven't read it.

Try to get it. In my eyes it is the best book about this topic. The secret of tesla is so damn good described in this book. I researched notes, articles, colorado spring notes and so on about tesla and tesla patents for years, but I never found the so called tesla secret. I didn't found it because I'm an electrical engineer and I saw his circuits always from the conventionel electrical sight... never from the unconventional (cold-electricity) view...

[Magnethos]

No, you misunderstood me a bit at this point. There will always be some current, not only voltage. I think to get pure potential we have to deal with very short duration switching and very high-inductive coils, but you get the point.

Sorry, I explained it bad. I meant that using high-inductive coils we can increase the saturation-time. Of course, we need to switch very fast also to get pure potential because if we use only the high-inductive coils it's impossible to get 100% pure potential.. So, using some high-inductive coils in series + very fast switch = pure potential. And we can use the technique you explained, to get a fast switching time. 
Maybe I will use 4 or 5 H-Inductive Coils to increase the saturation-time. I need to think about the possibility of using more or less coils.

In the next month I will try to get the book. Because I have a lot of books about electronic healing, to read in my bedroom.

So... I think we have the answer. We only need to build and see what happens. In theory, this device will work.

[PaulLowrance]

As I mentioned before, NRG were never be able to achieve overunity when he hasn't that high-inductive coil. With it, the relaxation-time increases to a range, where he can switch per hand...

It's the *only* way he's going to achieve "free energy," and that's exactly what he's using, a bifilar ferrite core.

PL

[Low-Q]

There is one event in the video at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RGgrkMocCo

watch minute 1:07 and 1:09.

where the COP is at least 5 in my calculation.

Have a look at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3fxOqjSsyc

He calculates COP= 16,
depends on what exact voltages you read there.
Also the chargeup backside cap is only 30 uF and not 32 uF.

But this is extremly interesting and definately overunity.

My calculation got me COP= 5  with using the 
start voltage= 25.88 Volts and end voltage 25.87 Volts on
the 7500 uF supply cap C1 and the 30 uF charge cap C2 charged up to 25.62 Volts.

So lets calculate:

Before test:
EnergyC1= 0.5 x (25.88)^2 x 0.0075 Farad= 2.511654 Joules

After test:
EnergyC1= 0.5 x (25.87)^2 x 0.0075 Farad= 2.509713375 Joules

Energy lost in cap C1= 0.001940625 Joules

Energy in Cap C2= 0.5 x (25.62)^2 x 0.000030 Farad= 0.009845766 Joules

So COP = 0.009845766 Joules  / 0.001940625 Joules = 5.07

Regards, Stefan.

Hi,

Here ar my thoughts:

D = Cap1 / Cap2 = 7500uF / 32uF = 234

If you connect the charged Cap1 directly to Cap2, the charge of Cap2 will be:

U_Cap2 = U_Cap1 - (U_{Cap1 - 1/D}) = 25,87V - (25,87 - 1/234) = 25,76V

If you go via the coil, Cap1 will build up a magnetic field in the coil. When the current is switched off, the magnetic field will break down and make a high voltage output. This high voltage is charging Cap2 to higher voltage. You did also see that Cap1 was discharging more rapidly during those tests - maybe there is a connection between taken energy and energy left?

Simply put: You cannot only measure voltage. And the calcs shows there is nothing mysterious going on. He claims that 1V is 234V. Ofcourse - Cap2 has 234 times less capacity, so in theory he could use that setup to charge Cap2 that much, but then the 1V has dropped to zero.

Hoestly, i cannot find any vacuum energy going on here. I am tired of misleading measurements. Put this Cap1, and Cap2 in a motor and see if it runs forever. That would provide evidence of COP 16 or not.

Br.

Vidar