ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[lancaIV]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_Catholic_cleric-scientists
A-Z extraction,thread relevant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Buridan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paolo_Casati
Casati's Terra machinis mota[edit]The astronomical work Terra machinis mota (1658) imagines a dialogue between Galileo, Paul Guldin, and Marin Mersenne on various intellectual problems of cosmology, geography, astronomy andgeodesy. For example, they discuss how to determine the Earth's dimensions, floating bodies, the phenomena of capillarity, and also describe the experiment on thevacuum made by Otto von Guericke in 1654. The work is remarkable for the fact that it represents Galileo in a positive light, in a Jesuit work, only 25 years after Galileo's condemnation by the Church.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenio_Barsanti
FatherEugenio Barsanti(12 October 1821 – 19 April 1864), also named Nicolò, was an Italian engineer, who together with Felice Matteucci of Florence invented the first version of the ]internal combustion engine in 1853. Their patent request was granted in London on June 12, 1854, and published in London's Morning Journal under the tile "Specification of Eugene Barsanti and Felix Matteucci, Obtaining Motive Power by the Explosion of Gasses

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicol%C3%B2_Arrighetti
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Bolzano
Wissenschaftslehre (Theory of Science)In his 1837 Wissenschaftslehre Bolzano attempted to provide logical foundations for all sciences, building on abstractions like part-relation, abstract objects, attributes, sentence-shapes, ideas and propositions in themselves, sums and sets, collections, substances, adherences, subjective ideas, judgments, and sentence-occurrences. These attempts were basically an extension of his earlier thoughts in the philosophy of mathematics, for example his 1810 Beiträge where he emphasized the distinction between the objective relationship between logical consequences and our subjective recognition of these connections. For Bolzano, it was not enough that we merely have confirmation of natural or mathematical truths, but rather it was the proper role of the sciences (both pure and applied) to seek out justification in terms of the fundamental truths that may or may not appear to be obvious to our intuitions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartholomeus_Amicus
Bartholomeus Amicus[/size] (1562–1649), or Bartolomeo Amico or Bartholomeo d'Amici, was a Jesuitpriest, teacher and writer who spent his adult life in Naples. The subjects he wrote about includeAristotelian philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and the concept of vacuum and its relationship with God.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedetto_Castelli
He was a long-time friend and supporter of his teacher, Galileo Galilei, and in turn teacher to Galileo's son. He assisted Galileo's study of sunspots and participated in the examination of the theories ofNicolaus Copernicus. Castelli was interested in mathematics and hydraulics. He was appointed as a mathematician to the University of Pisa, replacing Galileo, and later at the University of Rome La Sapienza

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Callan
Callan was ordained a priest in 1823 and went to Rome to study at Sapienza University, obtaining a doctorate in divinity in 1826. While in Rome he became acquainted with the work of the pioneers in electricity such as Luigi Galvani(1737–1798) who was a pioneer in modern ]obstetrics and Alessandro Volta (1745–1827) who is known especially for the development of theelectric battery. In 1826, Callan returned to Maynooth as the new Professor of Natural Philosophy (now called physics, where he also began working with electricity in his basement laboratory at the college.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_di_Casali
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Gordon_(Benedictine)   !!


Mentors,pionieers and fellows: the catholic church science history is in reality less obscur and dark than known and with all progress steps with several reformation and common wealth progress possibilities

The other listen  are not to become forgotten,but to many to reknown,read yourself and study if you want "Natural Philosophy"

[stupify12]

Trying to understand how the field works
If the field only reversed using ac to drive the coil it would be easy, but using dc we have bemf that reverses the polarity of the coil so this indicates the field is collapsing in reverse, if it continued in the forward direction there would be no bemf.
If the field ran opposed to the current direction all the time (as I once thought) then there would be no femf, so the field must grow in one direction then reverse and collapse in the other.
The bemf keeps us from tapping a coil like a flywheel, SM figured out how to stop bemf Im not sure but I have an idea how he did it.

Tesla answers you with this.http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-336,961-regulator-dynamo-machines?pq=MzM2LDk2MQ==
Look for the word neutralizing. I think you should read my posting on Clemente Figuera Thread-Energytic puro walay Latik. The controller you  used  only manipulate 1 coil into a Alternating Current action. For God Sake. Tesla Always use 2 Phase Alternating Current , the purpose is to neglect/nullify/neutralize the Lenz Law Effect. Once the 1st Primary induced to the Secondary, the voltage produce on the Secondary is IN PHASE with the incoming Magnetic Field of the 2nd Primary and vice versa which people called Lenzless Fkd Up Generator . I think you get the picture now how did Tesla completely destroyed Lenz Law.

Meow

[Dave45]

It will be apparent that the respective cores of the field-magnets are subject to the neutralizing or intensifying effects of the current in the shunt through c', and the magnetism of the cores will be partially neutralized or the point of greatest magnetism shifted, so that it will be more or less remote from or approaching to the armature, and hence the aggregate energizing actions of the field magnets on the armature will be correspondingly varied.

Maybe Im missing something here but my understanding is that when a coil is pulsed when the current is off the magnetism in the core is neutralized, this paragraph is explaining that the current is off as it approaches or leaves the armature depending on the position of the brushes a and b and c. this slows drag and sparking of the brushes.
The coil designs may also be redirecting the bemf induced into the coils but I really dont think its eliminating lenz in the cores.

[Dave45]

I ran across this in the Kapanze thread http://www.magnacoaster.com/magna/html/how_it_works.html
This might just work if the bemf cannot reverse the magnetic field in the core it cant run in the primary back to source.
very interesting

[stupify12]

Maybe Im missing something here but my understanding is that when a coil is pulsed when the current is off the magnetism in the core is neutralized, this paragraph is explaining that the current is off as it approaches or leaves the armature depending on the position of the brushes a and b and c. this slows drag and sparking of the brushes.
The coil designs may also be redirecting the bemf induced into the coils but I really dont think its eliminating lenz in the cores.

I think people on this field of research really don't get or understand Tesla easily. The patent I linked on you Dave is one of the Chapters of Free Energy Device. A Free Energy Device  as a whole is like a book which has so many chapters to study, one must read all inside the book to fully digest or understand THE WHOLE BOOK, not only the Chapters.  Read and Review again what I answered to you before this post. I already give it to you all you need on the last post, I write above.  Everything that others keep as secret is already answered on my last post. It is all there written boldly, read,review, analyze and refer it to the newly existing devices, if you think you can find it on there devices?

If you really wanted to understand Tesla , first you must leave and dropped everything you understand from classical physics or biased theories. All you need to do is read, review, analyze what Tesla was referring to on his illustration.

The patent I linked on you above, do you think the wires should always be connected as one? You never tried to think to separate them? Or do you think the coil will work if I separate them in TWO? Just ask simple questions to yourself like I give examples of questions. Have you ever tried to think does TWO Primaries really work, or we should stick to only ONE Primary? How can I achieve the neutralizing effect Tesla talked about using TWO coils as TWO Primaries? What should I do with the Bemf, Should I waste them or I should capture them and recharge my batteries? Its only a matter of questioning itself and a proper choice, or you could try everything that comes to your mind.

Meow.