ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Tito L. Oracion]

Tito...Well... presumably the receiver is Tesla's radiant energy receiver??

Well, maybe you were right.


or maybe its a GENERAL ENERGY AMPLIFICATION 


Imagine tesla made the magnifying transmitter expending lots of money? 
do you think he is not sure of the receiver or the amplification method?. think everyone!
where is the receiver patent? who is the one holding it?


So in that hint of tesla, IF we are just thinking, i am very sure now that FREE ENERGY IS real!.


OR MAYBE I HAVE TO BE A CREDIBLE PERSON FIRST ISN'T IT TINSEL KOALOC?. 


ETITS 

[Tito L. Oracion]

well..yes..kind of    think how you would modify it to get larger output then stop for a moment and rethink what you learned...the best way is to write it on paper and read next day and next day up to the moment you got it ...that's how I learned a lot

Tesla really gives us a good hint, imagine his electro magnet, its difference to the ordinary coil
test the effect and see how far the strength from ordinary coil.


now if we combine the capacitor kicking it in __________________ then if we put lots of receiving ___________ and be sure there is no traffic on the highway bridge. 
The result is over overunity.

note: in one kick there are two birds should be hit.       normally.   did you forgot my door to door delivery technique?.

by the way: You are lucky if you will wake up the next day.   


and  That is your exam today fill in the blanks.


etiots 

[a.king21]

I've looked at the document and I see nothing special. I see a couple of inductors wired together and some mistaken claims about how they are expected to behave. I assure you that they will not behave that way. The flattened wires or ribbons are classic Red Herrings, they have no functional significance in the device as shown. Such conductors are used in certain HF HV systems to _reduce_ the inductance of bus wiring or Tesla-style primaries, or to pack more copper into a compact winding geometry. They have no significance in the illustrated inductors.  Tito has never produced anything credible in all the years I've been looking at his "entertaining" posts, and I am quite sure that Kapanadze told you the truth-- it is so simple you'll laugh, at the concealed wires leading to his home's mains power connection to the grid, or the concealed batteries which provide the power to his clever fakes.

It would be ridiculously easy to prove me wrong: All Kap or Akula/Ruslan/Stivep has to do is send an operating self-running device to Stefan, or Sterlinga, or Chet, or even YOU for honest testing. That of course will never happen. And I know why... and so do you.

"The flattened wires or ribbons are classic Red Herrings, they have no functional significance in the device as shown."




I beg to differ. I enclose an extract from a book of the early 19th century illustrating the terms Cook used. Cook is in fact utilizing the collapse Emf also known as spike energy, or collapsing BEMF.
An analysis of the terms will help us to understand Cook's patent properly.

[TinselKoala]

"The flattened wires or ribbons are classic Red Herrings, they have no functional significance in the device as shown."




I beg to differ. I enclose an extract from a book of the early 19th century illustrating the terms Cook used. Cook is in fact utilizing the collapse Emf also known as spike energy, or collapsing BEMF.
An analysis of the terms will help us to understand Cook's patent properly.

You can beg to differ all you like, but what you show there is very different from the patent you asked me to read and comment on. Flat ribbon conductors, spirals and buses, are indeed used in various systems, and the reason for them is that they have lower self-inductance than the equivalent amount of copper in round wiring. For example if you want to conduct your capacitor discharge into other components or spark gaps and you do NOT want residual inductance to affect your performance by messing up the shape of the discharge pulse, you will choose ribbons over round wiring.  Tesla, and Cook, as you show, used ribbons for exactly that reason. But that is not a feature of the document I read when you asked me. Did I get hold of the wrong document by mistake?
Now, if you want to do a demonstration of the thing you actually wanted me to read, comparing ordinary round wire and flat ribbon wire, and can show some significant difference in performance in _that_ apparatus, I'd like to see it.
You are engaging in what is called "bait and switch" : here, respond to A you say, and then you wave B at me and tell me that my response doesn't apply to B. Well, duh.
Go ahead, show some work of your own concerning high voltage spikes, discharges of capacitors into various systems, voltage amplification by standing wave resonance, wireless transmission of _real_ power, or anything like that. Tito, the invitation applies to you as well. So far, over the years I have been on this forum, I have not seen anyone, except Farmhand, have a practical understanding or produce effects in those areas that are any better than what I show and explain in dozens of video demonstrations. MarkE has a real handle on the theoretical background of electronic systems and can give you all the theory you could ask for, and I build things that actually _work as I say they do_. Go ahead and prove me wrong with some demonstrations of your own.

[a.king21]

Tinsel: How can you say this is a bait and switch?
McFarland Cooke uses terms which are no longer in use today. I simply ask you to look at the terms he used in order to understand what he meant. What is wrong with that? I agree your knowledge of electricity is greater than mine - that is why I am asking your opinion based on what McFarland Cook actually says.