ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[bistander]

on the subject
magnetic force is the only key to free energy!!!Sir Von herman hemltzholz energy consevation law excempt....

according to our books, magnetic force cant do work? this is a BIG LIE

Hi luc2010,
Please provide list, or at least some examples, of those books with the page numbers where you find the "BIG LIE".
Regards,
bi

[WhatIsIt]

on the subject
magnetic force is the only key to free energy!!!Sir Von herman hemltzholz energy consevation law excempt....

according to our books, magnetic force cant do work? this is a BIG LIE

Can you provide some example of what exactly do you mean by that?

Thanks.

[forest]

yes, I found it too
magnetic field is continuous energy flow out and in - source of free energyFaraday law of induction is the way to tap itthe problem with current generators is only the BIG LIEthey are made to burn fuelthey have kind of positive feedback scheme which disallow COP > 1 while allow compact construction of generator , so it's mostly the smallest part of power plant ;-)yes, creating free energy 1000MW power plant is not an easy task, maybe impossible but 1000 1MW smaller ones running 24/7 is quite possible

[lancaIV]

1800,1900,2000,2020 :

Thousands words to 1 image
1 image to thousand words

Thousand images to 1 word
1 word to thousand images

2020 : the word : transformer         image : ?

1880-1920+ the word : transformer      the image : one coil

Soon 1 coil was in his function called " transformer" !
2 coils,bifiliar ? Pancake style ?


The older condenser/capacitor were based by two coils ! Later foils !




Magnetism and work : like the MEG(M for motionless)  T.T.Brown his MEP( P for pump)

https://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0211/0211001.pdf "..... not understood ..."



Two coils : seriell or parallel,Lenz and Fleming laws in action !?Magnetic field and its force behaviour ?

Google patents : John C.Bedini cited and citing applications related Back-EMF and closed pump  cycle
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4055789A/en

        Regenerative cycle or recycle : 100% never possible ,but also not in need !


      Difference : efficiency : ever ≤ 1 or 100% and
                            work C.O.P. ≥ 1



Thomas Townsend Brown in his 1928 GB motor application writing : C.O.P. : up to 1000000
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/010163175/publication/GB300311A?q=pn%3DGB300311A
In some instances the ratio may be even as high as a million to one.


Thinking and understanding how they in their time did !

Why N.Tesla moved from motor concepts to HF motionless coils/transformer systems :
his last rotative drive was a 293 poles motor ! Complex and costs !

And this was/is the base from Dr.Pavel Imris and my 2005-2010 work with the portuguese technician Jorge Ferreira !

Who study the above cited Bedini cited/citing applications will understand Dr.Pavel Imris his "capacitive windings circuit",low loss displacement energy ( voltage and current)  cycle  !

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=DE&NR=202016004514U1&KC=U1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20160812&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP


static / no moving mechanical parts




was has been rotative

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4055789A/en
An energy conserving electrical apparatus for driving a load and recovering otherwise wasted electrical energy utilizes an electric motor with field windings on one or more pole members and one or more rotors. During a first time interval whose duration is determined by motor speed, electric current is supplied to the field windings from a first charged battery, the current flowing through electrical switching circuitry to the field windings of the motor to thereby turn the rotor by establishing a magnetic field, as is well known in the motor art. During a second time interval, the duration of which is also determined by motor speed, the rotor's poles confront the poles of the field winding and the switching circuitry disconnects the first battery from the field windings and connects a second discharged battery to the field windings for charging of the second battery. When the first battery is disconnected, the magnetic field established by the field windings collapses and, as a consequence of Lenz's law, a first current increment is induced in the field windings. This induced current increment, which is opposite in direction to the current which was flowing through the windings and whose stoppage produced the first current increment, is conducted through the switching circuitry to the second battery to charge the battery. Almost simultaneously with the generation of this first current increment, the magnetic field of the turning rotor links the field windings, inducing a second current increment in the coil windings. This second increment flows in the same direction as the first induced increment and is also conducted through the switching circuitry to charge the second battery. At the end of the second time interval, the electrical switching circuitry disconnects the second battery and reconnects the first battery to the field winding to again deliver current to the field winding to drive the rotor. Accordingly, the described first and second increments of current induced in the field windings between bursts of driving current are recovered by the apparatus and used to charge the second battery.[/font][/size]




You reach the target when the coils/device stays COLD,superconduction state !




Sincerely
OCWL

[WhatIsIt]

Too much money was at stake, so faking is less probable.

Nix,

Random numbers are random and we can not predict sequence.

But dividing numbers will give sequences which we can predict,
because the result is always the same.

There is simple way to solve entropy.

2 small numbers divided can give up to 10 numbers before they start to repeat.

22/7 = 3.142857  with 2 small numbers which can be packed into 1 byte,
we wrote 7 numbers.

Which gives me idea.
Irrational numbers.

Pi is holding all combinations in universe never repeating.
Question is how to implement pointer to known sequence inside it?
I mean, for decoding, we dont remember sequences, but initial conditions to calculate pi from
given decimal point for the given length.

For coding we have to have pi calculated for maybe trillion decimals,
and write in table conditions from where cpu will start calculating,
but for decoding cpu just calculates pi from conditions.

So we remember conditions for calculating pi from given decimal point,
for the given length. Resulting in calculating needed sequence of x numbers.

We calculate. We dont remember sequences.

Another example is square root from 2,
same thing.
It holds all possible short and long sequences needed.