ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[stivep]

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/77-temy-ot-fantom/135067-tankodrom.html?start=252#259200
Electrons ... electrons ... don't bother.
Take a ferromagnetic bar with two windings, stick magnets on the sides so that the bar enters
saturation.  We feed the emf in the direction in such a way that the current creates a magnetic field opposite to the
field of magnets and core.  In this case, the primary has an inductive resistance, in which it occurs
a voltage drop, or rather voltage radiation to space.  Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped", induced in the secondary, a current arises.  The secondary current will create a magnetic field
co-directional with the field of magnets and core.  This means that there is no inductive resistance for the secondary current.
__________________________
We send the secondary in its entirety.  Whatever the current in the secondary, for the primary, the inductive resistance as it was,- it will continue to be so.  Magnets and core - medium, voltage primary - space activator (modulator), secondary - drain. Too simple, and therefore it does not fit in the head.  But for this to work, you need a small shamanic tambourine, you need to hit it once to "enchant" the core.   
related " ..... of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components ....." ?

What are Ferromagnetic materials?     
answer:
Those substances  known as Ferromagnetic materials  which when placed in the external magnetic field are strongly magnetized in the direction of external magnetic field
Thank you lankaIV
1. Example of Ferromagnetic materials are - iron, cobalt, nickel, gadolinium, dysprosium.
https://www.phybarik.com/2020/06/what-are-ferromagnetic-materials.html
_{Note: article  written in  "not so good"  English}

2. lankaIV's  link  of Russian Realstrannik is  from May 28.
   today in May 31 this link doesn't work and  that part of conversation there was deleted .
  It only tells how fast Russians  can spot Westerners paying attention  to their  writing.
_______________________________
For me the phrase is absolutely convoluted and some  of readers may assign it to  BS.
The good thing is that nonsense triggers thinkers to act.
In the world of physics phrase:

Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped",

is  likely an opinion of  some average Russian  car mechanic about  quantum mechanics.
- property of "space"  in unknown .
- interaction with that  "space"  is unknown.
- and form of response  of that "space" is unknown
____________________________________________
Here you have forces in ferromagnetic material.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Geometry-and-orientation-of-the-ferromagnetic-bar-on-the-Si-substrate_fig2_224143586
But interesting is that right below  of it you can see statement saying that
primary source  was  likely Russian Volodymyr Zagorodnii

_{Addition:
I was able to establish  that  Volodymyr Zagorodnii is legitimate researcher.
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-024-1687-9_6}

Some basic information is here:
https://www.intechopen.com/books/ferromagnetic-resonance-theory-and-applications/ferromagnetic-resonance

We developed a method to analyze broad-band ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)
data for rectangular ferromagnetic bars of micron and sub-micron thicknesses.
This method allows one to determine the gyro-magnetic ratio,
the saturation magnetization, and the damping constant of the measured structures

The problem  we are facing when dealing with  information is legitimacy.
And you are my friends  in the position of  assigning given information source  to garbage  or  see value in it.

But for thinkers the biggest BS'  may become valuable trigger for thinking.
like one here:
https://www.phybarik.com/2020/06/what-are-ferromagnetic-materials.html
_________________________
What I was thinking about is not  ferrite but ferrofluid in glass capsule and windings around it in presence of the bar magnets from the both ends.?
You can see in your  own eyes the response of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid

Wesley

[nix85]

...

[lancaIV]

nix85,not disturbing Your new topic ,current amplification related,


https://control.com/textbook/ac-electricity/phasors/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_displacement



For fishing in the Moray or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator


Energy and/or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy ampification


negative energy f.e. as positron   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir-Effekt




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_materials the zT


by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistivity_and_conductivity


by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity


and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seebeck_coefficient


and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature


all EE ,rotative or non-motive,conceptions are Maxwell/Carnot engines !


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics#Fermi.E2.80.93Dirac_distribution

[nix85]

Lanca if you got got a comment on parallel RLC current amplification
post it in my thread, not here

https://overunity.com/18878/reactive-current-parallel-rcl

[stivep]

nix85,not disturbing Your new topic ,current amplification related,
https://control.com/textbook/ac-electricity/phasors/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_displacement
For fishing in the Moray or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator
Energy and/or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy ampification
negative energy f.e. as positron   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir-Effekt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_materials the zT
by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistivity_and_conductivity
by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seebeck_coefficient
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature
all EE ,rotative or non-motive,conceptions are Maxwell/Carnot engines !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics#Fermi.E2.80.93Dirac_distribution

I don't know who you are lankaIV but I'm impressed with your work.
I do really thank you for that.
______________________
You are disorganized , You are taking to much space  for your posts,
and yes you are... you are one of the  beautiful minds,
frustrating me,  unstable, crazy , chaotic but beautiful. -who the  heck you are man?
I spoke to Chet telling him that your contribution to this forum  is in its  net value  absolutely unique in  positive  way.

_________________________________
It is sometime  difficult for me  to  identify   what you trying to  question or support or deny but in  one particular link of yours
I thought that you may try to defend  Ether, as  _{ever present ocean of energy} with its local internal fluctuations  and that would be somehow in line with
Dirac Sea. _{"of particles"}

Let me joke  a little here?
Quantum mechanics prefers:
-empties having some particles 
instead of 
-Dirac Sea where the US dollars as a sea or pile are covering you  totally in the infinite space
where one dollar  or one particle less or more  will never make any difference to you...

in the field of modern  Aesthetics,  emptiness is understood better:
-1 central figure like  President , King, Tzar and nobody alike in near space.( all others are small in background)
-1 distinct speaker in the TV studio .( all others are small in background)
-Empty room  with  one bee making sound is easily spotted.
-modern houses with hanging shelves, elevated cabinets  and empty floor that makes it look optically bigger.
-big car is big for the driver based on his empty space in it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetics

So when talking about Dirac Sea  replaced by Quantum Physics it is 
Quantum  that wants to know  what is in that empty  space.
And because quantum Physics works perfect  in other areas - classical  physics  degradation to a branch of it
was natural consequence  of  humanity correcting  its  own practical, scientific and aesthetically pleasant  position.

______________________
Some quotes from your link:

Dirac sea theory treats antimatter as a hole where there is the absence of a particle rather than as a real particle. Quantum field theory (QFT),
developed in the 1930s, deals with antimatter in a way that treats antimatter as made of real particles rather than the absence of particles,
and treats a vacuum as being empty of particles rather than full of negative-energy particles like in the Dirac sea theory.
Quantum field theory has displaced the Dirac sea theory as a more popular explanation of these aspects of physics.
Both the Dirac sea theory and quantum field theory are equivalent by means of a Bogoliubov transformation,
so the Dirac sea can be viewed as an alternative formulation of quantum field theory, and is thus consistent with it.^[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy
The last link is important as it  explains  also at its lower  portion a lot of  important terms:
Virtual particles
Casimir effect
Dirac sea
Quantum gravity phenomena
Hawking radiation
Black hole ergosphere and quasars
Wormholes
Warp drive
Antimatter
Dark energy
Dark matter
Exotic matter
Negative mass
Pressure § Negative pressures
Wesley