ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[lancaIV]

like what i always said, i'm putting anything here for my review of everything. 


nothing more   


by the way i'm 41 going 42 your almost bingo. 

classical view : in three years you will become a senior ,coming from the juvenil lifetime
                                          keep your youth well


Albern Onestein,many IQ-stones heavy : Am I silly or they ?


http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/1180            gives probably answer  

But it has been written in the textbooks on electrical engineering and electrodynamics for more
than 100 years that average pulse power is calculated according to the formula ( , which has
only relative pulse duration of current pulses SI only, and nobody has tried to check a
correspondence of the physical content of this formula to SI system.


  Do neither trust the POPE nore the "peers/doctor fathers" cause they are also only seller
                                                         

                                                Heat as Energy
             the "fathers/masters" of thermodynamics :
             Nicholas Sadi Carnot and Jean Fourier,physicians


            the "father/master" of "the law of energy conservation" :
                                James P. Joule ,beerbrewer
           and his translation servant Heinrich von Helmholtz,university docent


The real question,basics, about Tesla and other inventors of the 19./20. century is:
                       which materials did he/they used ?
                                                Fisica
                       and which electro-dynamic formulas,classical written
                                               Matematica
without translation/correspondence faults !
                                                   


and nobody has tried to check a correspondence of the physical content of this formula to SI system.

                  Hol(l)y Father/POPE  : Keppler/Gallilei 500 years for "desculpa/pardon-moi"
               
                So -500 years related- only 100 years lost is a win   

   What means Mother Earth ? Nobody is prefect   aehh,syntax error - desculpa-me,perfect
                                        Pardon,ma don-na mia   (parva )

[Dave45]

Anything you can do on the pos rail can be done on the neg rail.

[MarkE]

Anything you can do on the pos rail can be done on the neg rail.

That's very true.  The choice is usually driven by what is convenient and cheap.  Low side switches are generally cheaper and easier to manage than high side switches.  There are many good commercial drivers for both that handle up to 100VDC bus voltages without difficulty.  When you settle on what voltages you want to see on either side of your coils and what kinds of current you want to carry, then it should be pretty easy to find off the shelf parts that will do the job.  For this sort of arrangement, my first recommendation would be to go look at buck-boost regulators and controllers.  Linear Technology in particular ahs some good parts, even if a single one costs $8.00.

Technically both of your figures are variations on boost converters, because they switch the output side of the coil.  If you were to control the input and output switches independently, then each would be a buck-boost.

[Dave45]

Technically both of your figures are variations on boost converters,

Your right the difference is one boost's the neg and the other boost's the pos
Both are noninverted.

[Dave45]

The circuits can be put together as I did here, then we get a capacitive discharge on both rails.