Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 130 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 ... 1776
User actions

Magluvin

#6925
March 23, 2015, 09:01:25 PM
Without the springs in front of me, just thinking about it, if we have 2 of the springs described before, say in a vertical tube, then we put one spring in and then the other, I think 1lb will compress them each down to the 5in 1lb rating of a single spring. The lower one may compress more due to the weight of the other spring. so if thats correct, then...


2 springs inline would be like 2 batts in parallel. And 2 springs side by side would be equal to 2 bats in series, and the reasons being voltage is pressure and weight is pressure. And I suppose current would be distance of motion for the springs.  Example, 10 springs inline would take applying that pressure to compress them a longer time to do, at a particular rate.

Mags

Tito L. Oracion

#6926
March 23, 2015, 09:19:47 PM
The pole changing and connection adds the voltage of the battery, that is why in voltage multiplier it needs the direction to change so that it adds up isn't it.  ::)  weird huh.

Tito L. Oracion

#6927
March 23, 2015, 09:38:52 PM
Now lets say: we have one battery and we have three electrolitic cap of atleast 10k uf, then first connect them in parallel in the battery, then connect them in series with the battery and make a very fast and short discharge in a lots of coil in  a continous manner . do you think we can power up our house?, well that is just very simple isn't it. :)


INSTEAD OF SOLAR POWER.

Magluvin

#6928
March 23, 2015, 09:53:16 PM
Quote from: Tito L. Oracion on March 23, 2015, 09:38:52 PM
Now lets say: we have one battery and we have three electrolitic cap of atleast 10k uf, then first connect them in parallel in the battery, then connect them in series with the battery and make a very fast and short discharge in a lots of coil in  a continous manner . do you think we can power up our house?, well that is just very simple isn't it. :)


INSTEAD OF SOLAR POWER.

Hey Tito

So what would be the difference between charging the caps that way, or using a switching power supply with a step up transformer?

Mags

a.king21

#6929
March 24, 2015, 02:23:01 AM
Quote from: Tito L. Oracion on March 23, 2015, 09:38:52 PM
Now lets say: we have one battery and we have three electrolitic cap of atleast 10k uf, then first connect them in parallel in the battery, then connect them in series with the battery and make a very fast and short discharge in a lots of coil in  a continous manner . do you think we can power up our house?, well that is just very simple isn't it. :)


INSTEAD OF SOLAR POWER.
Tito:     Do  you mean something like this?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 ... 1776
User actions