time/gravity modified by casimir effect opposite of event horizon

[froarty]

The temporal anomalies surrounding objects caught in an event
horizon have been considered for years but IMHO recent claims of
exotic orbital states occuring in the confinement area between
conductive surfaces (casimir exclusion fields)also creates
anomalies. Gas atoms diffused into these cavities
are said to achieve subzero orbital states. I am proposing that just
like the acceleration that causes time to apparently slow down from
our perspective outside the event horizon that the deacceleration
inside an exclusion field causes time to race forward. Again it is
our perspective based on the normal flow of spacetime composed of
vacuum flucuations that we use as a measuring stick. The Casimir
effect is said to exclude longerwavelength flucuations but IMHO it
simply slows the waves -since our "measuring stick" in normal space
is not effected these waves now "appear" shorter / faster to us...
QED claims the waves inside Casimir cavities "upconvert" but I am
saying the waves do nothing, it is the speed of the stream is
changed! From our perspective the waves appear faster even though
the stream is actually being slowed in the same way that a spaceship
sucked into a black hole appears to slow down even though space time
is being accelerated. It seems counterintuitive but remember the
clock rate or measuring stick we employ is an intergal part of the
stream so our perception of time is completely relative. If our
universe were to cross a portion of the time dimension where this
stream moved more slowly we would be unable to detect it because of
this relative measure.

In a Casimir cavity any gas atom will have its' orbital rotate or
shrink without change to its' energy potential. So a hydrogen atom
becomes a hydrino atom and I guess a methane would become a methino.
space time is slower or you could consider it less dense in a
Casimir exclusion field. Like a ship going from fresh to salt water
the ship level changes without ever subtracting ballast (dropping a
shell). The magic here is that there is no reactionary forces to
resist these atoms from diffusing through the fields. It is
translated 90 degrees to the time stream â€"we may be pushing these
orbitals "up against" the plane of our time frame we call the
present like a blackboard character suddenly able to turn 90 degrees
and pin something through the surface of the chalkboard. The point I
wanted to clear up is that Dr Mills', Dr Haisch and Dr Modell all
believe the radius actually gets smaller and radiates energy as soon
as the atom enters the cavity â€" although Dr Mills doesn't
acknowledge any Quantum effects- They then believe nature restores
these orbitals when they diffuse back out of the exclusion field. I
am only an old RCA R&D tech but am convinced they are wrong. IMHO
the atoms do not radiate energy going from Hydrogen to Hydrino â€" the
stream of virtual particles is restricted through our present time
frame in these exclusion fields softening the boundary and allowing
the orbital to twist or submerge away from the normal space outside
the field â€" The boundary changes not the -13.5 eV of the orbital â€"
If they want to call this getting smaller ok but I believe becoming
more distant on the temporal axis would be more accurate. Dr Mills
published data collection indicates that these changes in orbital
values are incremental in nature following the same algorhytm as
normal shells. He claims to have achieved 30 stable shells below
zero state. I am not denying his data or math only one huge
misconception. There is no energy radiated as the orbit gets smaller
on the time axis and the only way to keep the atom from simply
floating back up to normal size is to form a covalent bond with
another atom while as deeply submerged as possible. This radiates
the normal energy of a bonding BUT more importantly it LOCKS the
orbital orientations one against the other in a physical location
normally occupied by the longer vacuum fluctuations.
The molecule is no longer free to translate back up to the surface,
As the new molecule diffuses out of the field the returning longer
flucuations return to find these arrogant little orbitals sitting in
their seat and start to pile up on the orbital boundary trying to
push them back to what we consider the surface in normal space but
the covalent bond refuses to let them budge it.

[AB Hammer]

froarty

Very eloquently said. But the average IQ here (even though above average) may not understand what you mean. Talk like if we where students, not professors. Only those who live that life of talk can truly understand that type of talk. Shorter and to the point with frames of references is the best way here.

Thanks JMHO

[brian334]

Mr. Hammer,
Speak for yourself, I understood every thing he said.
And I completely agree with his assessment of the IMHO.

[sushimoto]

...unless the boundary conditions exceed the bonding force
which would produce the signature Black Light plasma.
If Mills' was able to extract some of these hydrinos in
a stable state he would have a ready made space drive.
Drive the hydrinos through coiled tubing and let the boundary
conditions scratch and tear at space time.

http://www.byzipp.com/energy/

[Steven Dufresne]

The temporal anomalies surrounding objects caught in an event
horizon have been considered for years but IMHO recent claims of
exotic orbital states occuring in the confinement area between
conductive surfaces (casimir exclusion fields)also creates
anomalies. Gas atoms diffused into these cavities
are said to achieve subzero orbital states. I am proposing that just
like the acceleration that causes time to apparently slow down from
our perspective outside the event horizon that the deacceleration
inside an exclusion field causes time to race forward. Again it is
our perspective based on the normal flow of spacetime composed of
vacuum flucuations that we use as a measuring stick. The Casimir
effect is said to exclude longerwavelength flucuations but IMHO it
simply slows the waves -since our "measuring stick" in normal space
is not effected these waves now "appear" shorter / faster to us...
QED claims the waves inside Casimir cavities "upconvert" but I am
saying the waves do nothing, it is the speed of the stream is
changed!

Does this mean then that the total energy within the cavity increases? Not unreasonable since the sides of the cavity had to be pushed close together.

From our perspective the waves appear faster even though
the stream is actually being slowed in the same way that a spaceship
sucked into a black hole appears to slow down even though space time
is being accelerated. It seems counterintuitive but remember the
clock rate or measuring stick we employ is an intergal part of the
stream so our perception of time is completely relative. If our
universe were to cross a portion of the time dimension where this
stream moved more slowly we would be unable to detect it because of
this relative measure.

In a Casimir cavity any gas atom will have its' orbital rotate or
shrink without change to its' energy potential. So a hydrogen atom
becomes a hydrino atom and I guess a methane would become a methino.
space time is slower or you could consider it less dense in a
Casimir exclusion field.

Wouldn't space time be faster due to the increased frequency and more dense for the same reason? That's assuming I understood your first paragraph correctly, that you're saying that the long waves are still there (which I think would be the case too) but have been altered to become shorter waves. If I misunderstood then I withdraw my question.

In any case, this certainly stimulates some interesting thinking.
-Steve
http://rimstar.org   http://wsminfo.org