Working Perpetual Wheel Using Springs

[Bessler007]

No one likes their intellectual property stolen either.




Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

[Yortuk Festrunk]

@

Hi, Yortuk. I believe you., why not.  It give more tan your inventin...

In 1941, a man , in my hometown,built a very strong, powering wheel (like Bessler) with hundreds of little cars in the wheel that rolled in tubes (inner half) of the wheel..
wheel was about 30cm  and 70cm in diameter mad from iron parts
weight approx 30kgsi

So it is just as possible as Bessler: this one or your solution.

But it’s some power that is used to which no attention is given - and it is not included in the programming of the software to try or find it. So Working Model simulations are not TRUE in relation to mechanical, hardware experiments!!

I am sure that resonance is the KEY!! I am also very sure that more than one resonance will be the source.

Source can only be if (in minimum) two different resonances are working together in HARMONIC within supra or sub frequencies:

1. Springs
2. Weight of Balls
3. Rotational Speed

We have three different FREQUENCIES! If one is changed, NOTHING WILL WORK!

So it is very hard to reconstruct them - because you have not given attention to think and "save" this knowledge!!

So no simulation software can "find this out," because no programmer has done such to provide "ports for INPUT" to change such (unknown) values.

ONLY hardware experiments can make it possible to find a solution.
Gustav Pese

beam.to/zPE  (contact-page)

Yes, Gustav. The greatest scientific mind in history, Tesla, insisted that resonance is the key.

Every piece of a system must be in tune with each other, and the system as a whole, for peak efficiency.

[mindsweeper]

Hello Mindsweeper,

Always a pleasure to explain something to those less fortunate in the grey cell area. 

Making a claim that isn't true is the same as lying.  The blatant example is the name of this thread, "Working Perpetual Wheel Using Springs".  It's a friggin lie.  That's one of the similarities between this device and the one I posted.  There are other similarities.

Weights suspended by springs is another as are weights moving along  a ramp.  A stationary ramp vs a moving one is a difference.  I mentioned there were differences.  There are others but the chief similarity is they both don't work yet both were attempted to be passed off as ones that do.  Both ideas were presented by liars.

Thinking people get tired of being lied to in that fashion but I wouldn't expect you to understand.

I hope you liked the explanation.

Since I quickly complied with your request of explaining or shutting the fuck up, I have one for you.

Bite my arse, you arrogant, lying piece of crap.  You're arrogant in thinking you can make demands of me.  Demanding honesty from people isn't arrogance.  Again I wouldn't expect you to understand.

Oh yea, bite it right there . . . Not so hard  ... ah yes, yes!!


Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

Spoken like a true poet, I had to LMAO..

[capthook]

The tension of the springs/balls pulling against the wheel would result is serious resistance, like a brake.
One side the springs are releasing, but on the other side the springs are being tensioned.
Result - no gain.

I would think that even giving this device a HARD spin would result in it very quickly coming to a halt.

And a thread title of: "Look at this idea for a gravity wheel" would be much more appropriate than an assine shout of "Working Perpetual Wheel", which it obviously is not.

And your claims of being too busy touring the U.S. for the last 40 years to pursue your claimed building of the first perpetual motion gravity wheel in history makes you out to be a nutjob at best.

[hansvonlieven]

No one likes to be lied to.
Bessler007
Cmdr, MIB

Not true Bessler,

Go to any church, synagogue, temple, mosque or parliament in the world and you will find evidence to the contrary. 

Hans von Lieven