Stanley Meyer Explained

L505 · March 22, 2010, 06:14:30 PM

Quote from: HeairBear on March 22, 2010, 11:32:42 AM
Funny, I can strip electrons off of oxygen with only 5 watts of power! It's called an "Ionizer"...

Funny, so can I - but then again I can also run a light bulb that is 5 watts and that doesn't mean the light bulb is producing 50000 watts of free electricity. Electrons are like sticky magnets. It takes energy to pop off the electron from the atom, similar to how it takes energy to pop a magnet off another magnet. When you put the magnets near each other again (flame) and the magnet pulls the other magnet into it, you get back the same energy as you took to pry them apart.

If you can explain where the free energy comes from instead of just vague handwaving that "it takes 5 watts" then you're on your way to winning the noble prizes. For example, if you use 5 watts, your engine will be 5 watts - unless there is some other magic you are not explaining - which must be the case - or you're a quack. Don't get me wrong, I'm open minded - but vague handwaving from you folks and sending cute shrimp videos (which prove nothing) isn't gonna help much.

HeairBear · March 22, 2010, 06:49:54 PM

Quote from: L505 on March 22, 2010, 01:56:10 AM
Most importantly Stan never clearly explained how 4 electrons are stripped without expending energy. Electrons are not just waiting to be stripped for free. It takes great energy to strip electrons from atoms. That's what people don't understand when it comes to energy levels, and that's why there are all the free mol energy assumptions/miscalculations.

Now if you've discovered some magical way to strip electrons without expending energy, then you've gotta back it up with a sound theory and not quackery or assumption ("they'll just knock off because I said so due to my magical wave theory" isn't good enough).

People assume that it doesn't take much energy to knock off the electrons from the atom and that is simply not true.

Do you always argue with gibberish? This is the post I was addressing in the first place and now you want an answer to something else? Go educate yourself and figure it out like the rest of us! It helps to know what the hell you are debating in the first place. With the few nonsensical words you have written, it is clear you do not have the capacity to ponder such things let alone inadequate communication skills. If you truly believe this is all quackery, why hang around and argue about it? Is it because you are lonely?

L505 · March 22, 2010, 08:11:45 PM

Quote from: HeairBear on March 22, 2010, 06:49:54 PM
Do you always argue with gibberish? This is the post I was addressing in the first place and now you want an answer to something else? Go educate yourself and figure it out like the rest of us! It helps to know what the hell you are debating in the first place. With the few nonsensical words you have written, it is clear you do not have the capacity to ponder such things let alone inadequate communication skills. If you truly believe this is all quackery, why hang around and argue about it? Is it because you are lonely?

Look up something called "burden of proof" and "shifting the burden of evidence" and such phrases. When you are done that, please come back.

L505 · March 22, 2010, 08:15:17 PM

by the way, I believe that my car can run on chinese green tea bags and nothing else, because tea gives people less cancer so why shouldn't my car run on it? I just have a hunch but no evidence so you are to LOOK IT UP and don't bother asking ME for any evidence because I THINK my car can run on green tea bags so it must be true, until YOU prove it cannot work

HeairBear · March 22, 2010, 08:34:59 PM

Actually, I can prove that you may be able to run your car on "Chinese Green Tea Bags". Why would I ask you for any evidence, when you clearly have no clue? Are you asking me for proof or evidence? Of what? That I can strip electrons off of molecules with a small amount of power? Easy Cheesy! How will you prove it cannot work? With your hypocritical hand waving?