Stanley Meyer Explained

[onepower]

H2Opower

Here is how I see things. No one is talking about what I shared on this forum on my thread. I already know this is very new information concerning Meyer's technology to everyone as not a soul has ever talked about Meyer's technology in such a way that I am aware of. Most have brought to me different technologies that really aren't viable solutions instead of talking about what I just shared in an Open Source setting. This is what I see and can go back a few pages to easily prove what I am saying is true. When I say Meyer took this technology with him in death I meant it as I haven't shared how to actually go about mimicking a thunderstorm as I only shared the raw science behind the technology in an attempt to gainer some support for this technology as I move forwards with it.

I looked at your gofundme page and it looks like you have done some pretty good work. However I would point out that you are not the first to rediscover this process and disclose it. To my knowledge Victor Schauberger disclosed the bulk of this technology over 50 years ago in his decades of work. I get it, you have done a great deal of solid work however by no means are you the first nor will you be the last.

Meyer was very good at hiding the technology in plain sight as he purposefully left out the primary equation that governs this technology as well as a few other things. He was so good at hiding things that even those that actually held his technology in their hands missed things and thus copied it wrong which is why they were unable to duplicate his work. The main thing that separates me from them is I actually took the time to make use of the scientific method and where it lead me I followed.

I would agree and the first thing that caught my eye on your gofundme page was the segmented coil formers. I got a 3D printer a few years ago specifically to print my own segmented formers of any geometry or size I choose. If you do the research you will find these formers were invented in the late 1800's specifically to overcome the many issues associated with very high voltage coils. You know, there are many FE patents that state a coil or coils are used however they seldom show the coils or there exact relation to one another. Sure we could assume it is simple solenoid coils arranged in know ways however we also know this does not tend to produce the desired effects were looking for.

Concerning the VIC circuit, if you replace the water cell with a spark gap and add a few additional components you basically have the circuit diagram for the majority of know FE circuits. Which begs the question, is the circuit a FE generator hidden in plain sight with a glorified electrolizer cell/plasma emitter?. It could also be a multiplier process stacking one FE process (the circuit) on top of another (the plasma water cell) to exponentially increase the output.

You should also consider the evolution of Free Energy technology that every inventor including myself follow.
1)The first kind...First there are experiments and builds relating to mechanical based observable FE processes. Including water cells, engines, motor-generators, hydroelectric/wind power/solar enhancements as well as atmospheric and ground current devices.

2)The second kind...This evolves into non-mechanical devices including arranged or bundled coils, spark gaps or other switching devices also including emitters, antenna's and ground connections

3)The third kind... requires no observable switching devices and few if any components resembling coils. It relies almost solely on the attributes of the energy in question, the geometry and quality/structure of the materials often engineered and impulsive energy flows.

4)The fourth kind... Once FE is mastered it becomes obvious that matter, space and energy are integrated within each other and are fluid. The next logical step is the transmutation of matter for practical purposes and what many mistakenly call anti-gravity. It is not anti-gravity per se it is the removal of the reaction force within matter which is the cause of gravity. As it were 99% of the universe has little or no gravity and no concept of weight thus gravity is abnormal in comparison to the universal plasma-electric field of force.

You have chosen your path and I can respect that however there are many paths. I jumped right into FE devices of the 2nd and 3rd kind simply because they integrate into an electric energy economy much easier which I believe we are in the process of transitioning to. The only fossil fuel powered IC engines your going to see in 50-60 years will be in museums right next to the steam engines.

Regards

[lancaIV]

onepower : 

is an anerob bio-reactor  his output : not fossil. ? sewage = fosso-content
Can the bio-reactor fuel not be the base for this :
https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2859958A1/sv

Are we thinking in 15% average efficiently ic-engines or 90%  ic- engines. ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=10760

Is the Reinhardt-Turbine ( 30 KW/ 300 US$) + waste heat recuperator not cheaper than " fuel-cells/Brennstoff-Zelle". ?

The price from the " gun-engine"   ? Conventional ic-engine to gun-engine conversion kit. ?
https://peswiki.com/directory:gun-engine. = f.e. Suzuki engine converted



ic-engine optimizer :
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=13001

ic-engine with emission recuperator/ filter ~ pseudo- closed cycle. ?


Is this real, demonstrativ?   :  https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCjiLpxnCll-VmnaRS-Z93dA


h2O power : adaptive or concurrence. ?


1990- 2050 Kyoto conference agreement : - 80% GHG  With the above devices : easy/ difficult approach.  ?

EUGENIC = aristocratic competition.  = the best solution shall/will win

Not to forget : 1990 world human habitants/ consume per capita

                          2050 world human habitants/ consume per capita

                                                     1990 - 2050

                                     -  80% anthropogenic  GHG                                 

                                    +       % natural GHG increase
                                       GLOBAL ELECTRIC CIRCUIT : IONOSPHERE             
                         
                          WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING WITH THE MAGNETOSPHERE. ?
                                  Without "cosmic particle / solar radiation"- influence.  ?

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&q=magnetfeld+erde+aktuell&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiuipfvlYvlAhXn4IUKHVpZBLQQ1QJ6BAgAEAE
              GALAXIS "MilkyWay"  IN MOVEMENT/ SOLARSYSTEM IN MOVEMENT/EARTH IN MOVEMENT

[h20power]

Onepower,


What I am talking about is seeing the global electric circuit being mimicked is something totally new to practically all of you as I have read Victor Schauberger's work and that doesn't come up. But Meyer wasn't the first to mimic that for automotive use as Dr. Dingle came before he did and his coil setup looks exactly the same but he really wouldn't show people I just happen to know what to look for. This process goes along with mother nature and not against it. I also spoke of ease of implementation into our current technology with the automotive industries did I not? This technology will fit the way they already do things with very little change thus not causing them to have any stranded assets. They are not going to go for solutions that have them stranding a lot of their assets as truth be told a lot of them are going to fail due to just trying to switch to making EV cars. Furthermore since engines converted to use this technology will actually clean the air as they are operated doesn't that do better than something that is neutral?


Sure I can come out with other parts of Meyer's technology that will give an EV unlimited range but that isn't actively cleaning up the mess we have all contributed to our environment is it? I am looking at the big picture as the damage we have done needs to be reversed meaning it needs to be carbon negative not neutral. I know when I say this technology doesn't have any friends that statement would really bother some people as they have put their time into other technologies which they perceive to be totally viable, but they haven't asked these hard questions I just answered. If I go to convert a Maersk ship all I need is the proper injectors and a water management computer to drive the technology along with a Gas Processor installed on the intake system. And since it will now be using water as it's source of fuel can't it just get it from the ocean it's sitting in? That is what I am talking about when I talk about ease of use for our current technology we are already using as this technology doesn't have any equal in that department. This technology is the most suitable for wide scale adoption based on our current level of technology is what I am getting at. Sure there are other technologies out there but for quick and widespread use given our time limit of just eight years we needs solutions that can be easily implemented on a large scale. All of those other solutions you are talking about are not so easily implemented into our current ways of doing things and thus will have a high cost factor when trying to switch our systems over to making use of them.


As for being the first to actually solve Meyer's technology yes I am the first that I am aware of and disclosed the core science that this technology is mimicking in nature. If you know someone else please post there names and the actions they have taken so I can look them up too. Now as a test to this since I didn't disclose how to actually go about mimicking nature I'd be willing to bet until I choose to disclose everything not a soul will be able to get this technology up and running as it is not as simple as I made it all out to sound. The reasons I know this is no one has even gotten the voltage up to best my efforts back in 2013 and I fell short around 4 kv to get that WFC I was using to work. I am very much aware of what I have done and will say "thanks" if you are congratulating me in your own way as it took me many years to actually get at the science behind this technology.


As for the far future who knows what is going to happen? But I am sure this technology will be apart of that future in one way or another for it is a whole new era of scientific discovery just waiting to be discovered.


Shalom,
Edward

[lancaIV]

H2O power :

Kyoto conference agreement : carbon neutral, carbon negative economy  +  other GHG-emission

Paris conference agreement : temperature neutral, temperature negative economy


                        temperature in Calorie/Joule/Watt per capita limiting/reduction  !
                     
                                       Included : temperature-dirty electricity.  !
       

[onepower]

IankaIV

Are we thinking in 15% average efficiently ic-engines or 90%  ic- engines. ?
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=10760

Efficiency is one part of it however a large number of highly machined moving parts requiring oil lubrication dictates that the IC engine can never compete with electric power. We could have a FE generator with no moving parts and electric wheel motors with only one moving part as such the entire system would only have a few moving parts. Now if we could integrate the FE generator into a generator-motor wheel with wireless control then we could simply slap it on any vehicle and go. There is no future where an IC engine could possibly even begin to compete with electric vehicles in my opinion.

Hell my next vehicle is going to be electric for no other reason than low maintenance, no toxic explosive fuels and no damn dirty oil changes... ever.