Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[Mike Furness]

Hi All,
        I'd like to add my input to the 'fad' of PM magnetic motors that seem to appear annually.
Time to see what they all have in common.
1.0, Always steeped in controversy, with claim and counter claim as to if they work or not; and the most famous, Steorn, who were going to show to the world, failed at the 11th hour because it hadn't the energy to overcome it's minuscule bearing losses. this introduces point 2.0. Only occasionally are they able to overcome bearing losses, and then by a margin of microwatts or so! 3.0. They are unable to be scaled, or to produce any excess of power!
i posted privately to Sterling, a week or two ago, of the NON OU origin, simply magnetic 'domain flipping', (can buy refrigerators based on this!). Simply, if you provide enough energy to take a magnetic domain to it's 'over centre' position, and then remove the coercive force, the domain cannot stop, and the only place it can obtain the energy from is the electrons buzzing around at 'ambient' temperature, the magnet may get a degree or so cooler, but highly inefficient.
The reason for this post is to introduce a NEW DEFINITION to so called 'magnetic motors. ONLY IF IT ACCELERATES RAPIDLY TO THE POINT OF NEEDING MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL BRAKING IS IT REAL OU!
Unless it displays this characteristic, be it OU or not, will it be of any use!

comments?

Mike
Mike. J. Furness.

Bcc: Mylow

Hi Jez,

Sure, we'd love to hear you elaborate how you think this is working.

I received a phone call yesterday from Wes Crosiar, who has been immersed in free energy research for about 25 years.

He is the one who came up with the idea that magnet polarity flipping in the magnet is part of what makes magnet motors and electromagnetic overunity systems work, such as what Bedini has in his motor.  Bedini apparently included something to this effect in one of his patents.  Wes conjectures that this is part of what is causing the stator magnet to get cold in Mylow's set-up.

Unfortunately, I was meeting with a couple of guys about the Mylow motor when Wes called, so I wasn't able to take notes or take much time with him.  He said he had a heart attack last week and is in recovery, so I might not hear from him for a couple of months.  Our wishes for a speedy recover go out to him.

He also said that Tom Bearden recently wrote something about Mylow's magnet motor.  I looked for it over at http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/ but don't see it listed there.  Maybe one of you knows where we can find a copy?

In other news, I was in on a conference call involving Al Witherspoon a couple of days ago.  Al said that Howard Johnson was a neighbor to Ed Leedskalnin (Choral Castle) for a while, and may have gotten some of ideas from him.  Al wondered if maybe lay lines might be part of the equation here -- that the motor would work better in some places than others, or perhaps not at all in others.

Sterling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy"
To: "Sterling"
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:39 AM
Subject: mylows magnet motor


Hi,
I have been reading up on Mylow's magnet motor. I also have been reading
a pamplet by Ed Leedskalnin called magnetic current. I believe this
explains why it works and why the stator magnet discharges. It is not
conventional and with conventional theories as I am sure you are aware
this motor should not work but it does. If you have any questions please
write me, I would be happy to explain what is going on as I understand
it. I have my magnets on order and hopefully I should be able to get one
working and then take it to the next level, my solution was actually
inspired from Tesla's energy transmission coils......

Many thanks, you have a fantastic website,
Regards,
Jez

[dixiepnum]

 

@plengo fausto....

hah...remember that funny post I did a few weeks past, about bearden, steorn et al....showing up in mylow's apartment, and the whole thing blowing up in the dark?

well, it's sort of coming true isn't it?



dixie

[0c]

2.0. Only occasionally are they able to overcome bearing losses, and then by a margin of microwatts or so!

Only occasionally? Please show me just one?

3.0. They are unable to be scaled, or to produce any excess of power!

Since there are no OU devices (yet), what should be scaled?

ONLY IF IT ACCELERATES RAPIDLY TO THE POINT OF NEEDING MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL BRAKING IS IT REAL OU! Unless it displays this characteristic, be it OU or not, will it be of any use!

Yes, it will prove the principle that it is possible to produce more output energy than is required for input. All it takes is a device that simply continues running without an external supply of energy. Once that is accomplished, the techniques can be improved. But it ain't happened yet.

Once we learn how to crawl, we can start trying to take the first steps.

[queue]

Quack

[nyctuber]

Am I correct in assuming that most of the people here have written off Bearden and Bedini? They both seem to be frigging geniuses. I know that Bearden talks alot about Scalar technology and how it's supposedly being used for weather control and triggering earthquakes. There HAVE been a shitload of earthquakes lately. lol