Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[hartiberlin]

Hi Sterling, why dont you just ask Mylow to let the Radioman from Chicago come to his flat and verify personally his findings ?
Then we would not have such debates over here.
Its finally time for Mylow to come forward.
Regards, Stefan.
P.S. am 2 days away with only limited PDA access and have not read yet all messages.

[TinselKoala]

funny, i've watched all your youtube videos, most of them several times. i missed the one(s) where you debunk stiffler's circuit. could you kindly point me to those?
i don't recall you posting anything of substance in stiffler's thread either. i could be wrong. it's a long thread with a lot of talking heads, i could have easily missed your posts. maybe you're one of those lurkers on the thread like myself that doesn't really want to play the with grumpy bear that stiffler sometimes is, i don't know. i am however quite interested in comparing your data on the SEC to what stiffler has shown, that is if you have any data...

Stiffler is taking his class through some basic RF circuits that can be found in 1940's ARRL handbooks, among other places. But you don't have to believe me. There's a very simple way to PROVE ME WRONG. Just close the loop. Let one of Stiffler's devices power itself--or power another one, and let that one power the first...or charge up some caps and let them power something...but be sure to show your measurements, and use a good fast oscilloscope.
When you or anyone on Stiffler's thread shows a self-powered device, or one that genuinely produces more ENERGY than it consumes, I will be the first one to apologise publicly, right after I sell my oil stocks.
Like I said, PROVE ME WRONG. Otherwise, you are just blowing hot air.

[markdansie]

Dear Stephan and others
I recieved the following in an email recently from Sterling . I feel it is self explanatory.

Shame on you.  You're as bad as the hoodlums over at OverUnity.com who have likewise jumped to shaky conclusions without evidence about fraud.  That is an actionable offense and could result in litigations, just as fraud can be litigated.
Mylow is inclined to pursue.  Back off.

kind regards
mark

[TinselKoala]

I would be happy to meet MyLOW in a court of law, because in order to prove libel, he would have to prove that his magnet motor is real. That would be worth a lot, even losing a lawsuit.

Now, let's get back to talking about that physical threat of violence in Sterling's website. Or did you miss that? I just checked, and it's still there.

EDIT:
""I'll tell you this, some of those really obnoxious skeptics who act more like paid provocateurs, should be glad they're not walking around in person with those of us who are trying to help bring this technology forward. They might have a black eye or two."
--Sterling

[hansvonlieven]

Good, let him sue us!

Then he has to prove in court that he is not a fraud, disclose his motor and subject it to scrutiny. I wish him luck.

Hans von Lieven

EDIT: LOL TK. I love simulcasts