Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.

slipstream

Quote from: markdansie on May 17, 2009, 04:25:33 AM
<snip>
@ Slipstream,
I posted your link over at the Mylow forum.....here is Sterlings comment on them.

"Mark Dansie brought these to my attention:
I've uploaded them here, and I'll be adding some of this great info to the plans I've prepared.
For those of you who get on my case for selling plans, remember, I'm doing this full time, and we need some way to stay afloat.  While we sell plans at http://mylowplans.com everything is free at http://MylowMagnetMotor.com  It's just more clear and concise in the plans I sell."
<snip>

Thanks Mark. My plans, much like I assume Sterling's plans are, are based on widely available information. I take no issue with him including the information in his plans. However, use of the custom generated images (from my plans) in his plans would constitute a violation of law and would make me most unhappy. I'm not generally a litigious man (actually I'm quite reasonable), but my plans specifically state that reproduction for anything other than personal use is a bad idea. Please pass these sentiments on to Sterling. If he'd like to contact me directly to discuss the matter he can reach me at jdevereaux@gmail.com.

Thanks, Slipstream

Bobbotov

Quote from: oscar on May 17, 2009, 04:46:20 AM

@wattsup
please ban the <what I call relentless idiots>, or at least put them on some kind of scheme where they can only make 1 posting per day, max.
Please.
Please remember that you felt sick last time, when you had to read their postings. Why should other people and new readers get sick as well, if you can prevent it?
please don't become a toothless tiger, by only admonishing them time and time again.
Thanks

The OU/FE has had as part of its history a strong feeling that all of the endeavors put forth over the last many decades by numerous individuals are being countermanded by a conspiracy to suppress any form of universal free energy from being brought to the light of day. The bogeymen range from threatened scientists trying to ensure that the laws of thermodynamics are not violated to Big Oil companies and some clandestine army of Men in Black and the mysterious ultra secret Illuminati.

Not just here but in virtually every venue in which FE/OU is discussed anywhere on the Internet there are accusations that certain posters are either paid or not paid to debunk, derail or sabotage the efforts by those who ardently believe in FE/OU. It is imagined that these people's whole purpose in life is to tear down any effort to provide the world with the ultimate perpetual energy source.

So I find it very odd that the fear of suppression which seems to be pervasive with FE/OU proponents is actually being sought by the very same groups that cry that they are being suppressed. Is this not a blatant double standard?

Dissension in science is a good thing. It forces those who make claims to be ever so more careful in meeting the stringent requirements of due diligence. It forces them to rise to standards and not reduce the whole process down to information that has been sugar coated to the point of being useless and wrong. It prevents people from spending tremendous amount of time and effort on something that is fundamentally flawed from the get go but is allowed to flourish unopposed to every enthusiast and participant's peril. It forces a level playing field so that no one can arbitrarily make claims no matter how sublime or ridiculous from gaining traction when such actions are leading people astray.

Every scientist that publishes papers for peer review knows they are opening themselves up to validation/falsification/replication and they also know that validation/falsification/replication is the only way to ensure that the ideas they are promoting are valid and true. Regardless of how the idea may violate any laws extant in science that have up to that point been seemingly sacrosanct it is imperative that the process be unimpeded by any powers that be for fear that one voice no matter how right or wrong does not dominate. If any aspect of science cannot be challenged at any level than the whole process will be compromised to the point of being useless and nothing good will come of it. And any aspect means those that have been tenets of science for a long time and those that are newly being proffered. Violation of this process is anathema to science and any time you see someone who is attempting to squelch dissension the health and effectiveness of science is destroyed.

There are so many things that are odd and inconsistent with regard to this particular iteration of FE that it demands counterbalance. This does not mean that it is a free for all and some level of decorum is obviously necessary to prevent chaos but that should not include those voices who merely point out things that some do not wish to hear.

TinselKoala

"@TK
Did you get the message loud and clear. With the brains you have and the equipment and skills you have, your attitude and acts have been an insult to the OUers conduct. You have not helped but have hindered. You have aided in alienating our only point of reference. Thanks. Your escapade is over. I see now you will never be serious about OU endeavors."

And yet, you cannot point to a single thing that I've said that is untrue or demostratably wrong.

Consider this, from your unshakeable position: If Mylow is true, I will be out a thousand dollars (which will be worthless anyway) and I might be a little embarrassed, while I'm running for the hills. If Mylow is false, though...how will you, Wattsup, feel and what will you do, after making the statements you've made?
If you were a poker player and that was in the pot, would you bet or fold?

I made my last two videos in direct response to a request from Mr.M. I took that last picture to show that my stub axle and Mylow's are just the same size, because, guess what, someone said, right here, they weren't, and I showed the small battery and motor because, guess what, someone said right here that it could not be done.

Who is telling you the truth?

What is being suppressed, and by whom?

EDIT to add: By the way, can anybody please give me a link to a Mylow "replication" that works better than mine or CLaNZeR's does, when tested properly?
Thanks in advance.
--TK

broli

I believe he divulged the true secret. For some reason this makes sense to me now. Adjusting it one by one like he says until you find the point of least resistance.

Yucca

OK, just a note to say that I am withdrawing my offer of $2000 for mylow to let stefan visit and $1000 for stefans expenses ($3000 total). When my wife found out she went crazy, so that's that lol.

I wish all the replicators the best of luck with their work on this, they're gonna need it!