Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

RunningBare

Gah!, why'd you go and end a good debate with logic
Yes, you cannot prove a negative, ergo, no proof, no validity.

Quote from: Psyclone on May 23, 2009, 12:36:38 PM
"Absence of Proof is not Proof of Absence"

Psyclone

Quote from: RunningBare on May 23, 2009, 12:47:26 PM
Gah!, why'd you go and end a good debate with logic

D'oh! Sorry. I thought we were about done :).

TinselKoala

Quote from: Psyclone on May 23, 2009, 10:53:14 AM

Hehe..

Hopefulls: They "want to see" no string - and don't.
Skeptics: They "want to see" a string - and do.

...but somehow your position is that 'bias' doesn't apply to someone with a skeptical mindset?  Those people aren't included in the earlier "all" statement?  Cool.

As the camera pans in the video in question, the "compression artifact" continues to describe the SAME LINE wrt the stator support, and it moves in PARALLAX just as it should if it were an image of an actual object suspended in space at the height of the hole.

That's a pretty good trick for a compression artifact.


Psyclone

Quote from: RunningBare on May 23, 2009, 12:47:26 PM
Yes, you cannot prove a negative, ergo, no proof, no validity.

...but just to humor you, I meant the quote to be in relation to "just because it's never been done before - doesn't mean it can't be"... but I do like how you twisted it to your own means :) .

TinselKoala

Psyclone, I get what you're doing and I'm all for it.

I'm one of those, who, for various reasons,always KNEW that Mylow was faking it. Why? Suppose someone told you that he could go up a tall building, jump off, and land safely in front of you without spilling his decaf latte, in his shirtsleeves and civvies.
Yes, for that reason.Some things really are impossible, without hidden aids.

So when I started looking at Mylow's vids, my question wasn't "how am I going to build an exact duplicate of what I'm seeing, which appears to be a real running magnet motor" but rather " what I'm seeing cannot be as represented, so how could he possibly be faking it".
Sure, my intellectual and experimental bias is obvious here. But my bias has certain bases in fact. I'm not going to abandon them for a different set that is based on innuendo, anecdote, fuzzy thinking and weird theories.