Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[NerzhDishual]

Hi Guys,

As 'Siné' (a French cartoonist) stated:  I prefer cats  to dogs because there are no Police Cats.

Very Best et bien le bonjour chez vous...

[NerzhDishual]

Hi witty OU dot com Guys,

Just my 2 cents.
IMHO: PaulLowance is a creative researcher/doer and has a strong personality.
We need people like him. Why would he be fired/proscribed out of this very forum  (or any place, BTW)   
---------------------------------------
Now, a little story, just for the fun of it:
A 82 years old friend of mine (who, BTW, is also very creative with too a very strong personality) told me that he managed to get (twice) a sefl-runing-for-a-while-all-magnets-only-driven-device.
For-a-while because the ring magnet degaussed!

It was built from an old garbage car alternator, one ring magnet from
another  dead microwave oven and some 'parallelepipedal' magnets from Conrad.
http://www.conrad.fr/aimants_ndfeb_p_18925_18998_51972_51977_FAS#
Code : 503622-62

I visited him but he was not able to reproduce the phenomenon. Classical! 
He offered me his 'thing' (but without the Conrad's Magnets).
So it is up to me to reproduce his claims.

Guess what?
I still not have ordered the said magnets.
Why?
- Because I have not being able (patient enough?) to run a mere Levitron and
he told me that it was a question of very accurate adjusting.
- Because, to me, this this sounds nothing but serendipity, chance, stumbling upon,
coming across.

I'm just wondering whether, should you not have any 'OU Mojo', (this kinda 'OU magical charm') it could work?

Yes, IMHO, 'OU' is possible.

But, magnets-only-motor is not the easiest way and seems to be only allowed (for the moment) to few.

Is/was? Mylow part of these happy few. That is a question.
Now: this MyLow saga looks less and less like a deliberate scam according to his vids.
Or is it a very long run one?
----------------------------------
You might have a look at Bill Tiller from Stanford University about some kind of strange stuffs.
This article is about such matter: http://www.cheniere.org/misc/golden.htm
Yes, TH. Bearden is a new relativist and dare not to pronounce the very word 'Aether'.
-----------------------------------
Some pictures of/about the Jean S. 'widget'
Very Best.

[vince]

@ NerzhDishual

I was intrigued by your posting about your friends device.  I placed a microwave magnet in the center of the platform  that I build earlier in this thread and held varies magnets above it to see what kind of reaction it gave.  I tried a second microwave magnet on the flat plain and also two stacks of neo's side by side. Mind you, I only held them by hand but I really think you should try your setup!! It was extremely easy to get a full rotation with both magnets. I will be pursuing this but you already have one ready to go. Give it a try!! I think you will be surprised.

Vince

[slapper]

Does anyone know where to get a hold of the raw data that Howard Johnson and Steve Davis mapped out with their XYZ Table/Hall Effect sensors?
Some more detailed specifications of their setup would be nice.
The book published by Cheniere Publishing says that the sampled data was stored on a floppy disk.
Does not seem that anyone went beyond the 3D imaging of the data that appears in the book.

Thanks and take care.

nap

[sirinewton]

Just my 2 cents.
IMHO: PaulLowance is a creative researcher/doer and has a strong personality.
We need people like him. Why would he be fired/proscribed out of this very forum  (or any place, BTW) 

G'day all,
I have to agree with this quote. People like Paul are definitely needed here. They can provide the ponybrake with their sometimes brutal comments to get others to stop, stand back for a moment and take stock of what they doing.   In other words, it teaches you to apply critical analysis to a problem. Now, when you do or don't get a mathematical answer to the problem, you must stand back again and ask yourself  -"is this yes or no answer reasonable and does it make sense?" based on the laws of physics and maths.  It's all about common sense based on past and current physical repeatable evidence using those stated laws.  This is what all undergraduate engineers are vigorously taught.

Now, I don't believe all the so called 'skeptics' on this 'free energy' research are out to get you.  You may get the odd vindictive type who gets a kick out of seeing people fail because he or she thinks they are smarter than you. Fortunately some are very smart, but unfortunately they leave their manners in the dumb dept.  That's life folks.
I dare say that most 'skeptics' here are trying to help others realise that the fundamental laws of nature are to be adhered to.  This could save them time, heartache and of course money.  If, on the other hand you have plenty of time and money then by all means go for it,
BUT!!!
Now, I don't know how many on this forum have a physics or maths background, but I strongly recommend those who don't to go and do a basic physics and mathematical foundations course at a college or night school, or grab some books and teach yourself.  This will enpower you with the tools necessary to play with this type of research to know what can and cannot work. I believe this idea would at least put a lot more people on the same page and reduce the 'us' verses 'them'  mentality.