Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

pinestone · March 24, 2009, 01:01:53 PM

Quote from: PaulLowrance on March 24, 2009, 12:03:25 PM
If people here are completely uninterested in having notable scientists analyze his machine, then you should accumulate a lot of different PM's to give or loan to mylow. Mylow believe's that it will work with stronger PM's.

Also, it would help if you give or loan him some tools. Perhaps a gauss meter, digital handheld tachometer, calipers, perhaps digital sensitive scale.

PL

I'll be sending you a small (3" square) sheet of viewing film within the next few days to forward on to Mylow.

If you think one of my dynamic etalon lenses would help, let me know and I'll send one of them, too.
(view the lowest potential of the magnetic field) see: http://www.nanomagnetics.us/white%20led%20light%20room.JPG

PaulLowrance · March 24, 2009, 01:06:36 PM

Quote from: BEP on March 24, 2009, 12:48:50 PMIf you have one use an old TV screen, of Trinitron type with no shadow mask. You will see where the filings and FEMM fail.
Try it before you flame me for the suggestion.

BEP,

Calm down. The most common problem with people using FEMM is they do not understand that it is either a Planar or Axisymmetric problem. A lot of problems cannot be properly entered into FEMM. If you want, email me a problem you believe fails in FEMM.

These are simple issues taught in academic schools.

PL

pinestone · March 24, 2009, 01:17:22 PM

Quote from: PaulLowrance on March 24, 2009, 01:06:36 PM
BEP,

Calm down. The most common problem with people using FEMM is they do not understand that it is either a Planar or Axisymmetric problem. A lot of problems cannot be properly entered into FEMM. If you want, email me a problem you believe fails in FEMM.

These are simple issues taught in academic schools.

PL

BEP is right. Position an old Trinitron tv or monitor with the screen upright, and the magnet's fields become quite visible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLHS_eMAWs&feature=channel_page

and this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bzDvvS3PfE&feature=channel

and this is what I mean about viewing the lowest potential with one of my lenses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byxCYvDjFRM&feature=channel

PaulLowrance · March 24, 2009, 01:20:57 PM

Quote from: pinestone on March 24, 2009, 01:17:22 PM
BEP is right. Position an old Trinitron tv or monitor with the screen upright, and the magnet's fields become quite visible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLHS_eMAWs&feature=channel_page

Very nice!! Anyhow, that does not make FEMM incorrect. It only means people need to understand how to enter a problem in FEMM, or to know when it's impossible to enter such a problem in FEMM.

Quote from: pinestone on March 24, 2009, 01:01:53 PMI'll be sending you a small (3" square) sheet of viewing film within the next few days to forward on to Mylow.

Good idea! Mail it to the people who will travel to analyze mylow's machine.

Anyhow, also add to the list an accurate digital thermometer with at least 0.01C resolution. A lot of people would like to know if his stator PM is cooling.

I have a meter with 1E-6C resolution, but it's too difficult for most people to use. It would require academic scientists to use it.

Just kidding!

Thanks,
PL

chrisC · March 24, 2009, 01:34:01 PM

Quote from: pinestone on March 24, 2009, 01:17:22 PM
BEP is right. Position an old Trinitron tv or monitor with the screen upright, and the magnet's fields become quite visible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocLHS_eMAWs&feature=channel_page

and this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bzDvvS3PfE&feature=channel

and this is what I mean about viewing the lowest potential with one of my lenses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byxCYvDjFRM&feature=channel

Yes, even I can see them clearly on the screen with my bad eyesight.

Good thing I did not study those 'academia' books taught by those lofty academic scientists!

cheers
chrisC