Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[AnandAadhar]

@AnandAadhar

"If not, then I, as a clinical psychologist have to say, that it is not refuted that Mylow is a sociopath playing cruelley with our hopes."

Sorry but as a "clinical psychologist" you should know better then to pronounce such statements without doing a proper one-to-one. This is totally out of line and free judgment that is endemic to many members on this board and especially on this thread.

Why can't you guys just use your brains before you quickly write something down and post it. Why can't you just re-read your post, understand what you are saying, purporting, accusing and implying. What is it in your mind that allows you to just spew out every little angst and fancy. Where do you get off being so holy and all mighty that you think all you have to do is post some words and think it is real.

Sorry but if someone needs some help, you should maybe look in the mirror.

OK so you made a Mylow wheel replication. Two magnets per rotor is not good because you have created two blotch walls per rotor whereas channel magnets only have one. Is that easy to understand. Why would you equate your build not working with Mylow being a fake.

What's really wrong with @Sterlinga knowing that there are more builders out there that will never consider going through 200 something odd pages of "mostly" (because some here do care) pure crap to find out how to build a Mylow Wheel when they can buy a 25$ plan that is the best known and accurate plan of his build. Do you think everyone is that stupid and has hours and hours to spend in pure verbal torture. Well then get with the program boys because this is the real world and serious people do not have the time to waste. @Sterlinga knows this is the only way because once this thread dies out, as it surely will and only merits, then the only thing keeping this idea alive will be his efforts. So don't give me this holier then holy bit that selling a plan is bad, profiteering, or whatever.

Maybe I should sell some plans on how to do a self-inflicted lobotomy. Maybe this will help some of the brainiacs here get with the program. As soon as you leave the realm of common courtesy, you not only insult the inventor, but also insult members of this forum because any of us could be on the receiving end from one day to the next with a new discovery. Most are just acting like a bunch of animals with verbal skills.

Look Ma, I can write. Yeh but can you think before you write, or read and think of the impact before you post. No, why should I. What's gonna happen. Ahhh it's all pure junk.

We had in the past banned members here like @Humbugger for only 5% off what was dished out on this one thread and let me tell you, things are gonna change. Stay tuned.

I believe that change will come with sincere experimental endeavor. But I also believe now, in agreement with with Hans von Lieven and others just posting before me, that this is a scam. I think that to continue believing in Mylow is more harmful to the cause than not doing so.  I don't give him the advantage of doubt anymore. If you want to, that is your matter. As a psychologist I am perfectly entitled to protect people just like you against this type of illusions. Especially when you are this agressive  about my stance. Now, that is really harmful. Us quarreling this way about something that is most likely a scam. This forum must be open to such options and thus also allow such discussions.  I honestly tried Mylow, and considering what he is doing now, I rest my case and return to my own IPMM project. I maintain that your offensive attitude about my justified remarks is uncalled for. A one to one is not needed when there is proof of conscious manipulation of at least two observers. Sterling and von Lieven were both approached and manipulated by Mylow. They differ in opinion about him and I, from the personal testimony of von Lieven take sides with him. There is nothing wrong with that and that is how it goes. If you don't like it, let it be. Nevertheless, I hope you are right that this thing maybe another way is possible and that Johnson is an authentic to be trusted authority. But I have my doubts about him, we are never totally sure until we replicate namely, whatever the testimony. So, the opposite option mustn't be denied either. Fact is that we can't replicate as yet. Till then I rest my case, whatever you say. This thing doesn't work for me and all the others who tried this or another way, apart from Mylow. Not with the proper materials like Claenzer proved, not with all the skills we have like with Tinselkoala (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvWt9Llklyg&feature=channel_page) has, who also doubts whether Mylow is feasable. Study these guys also. That's why I wrote my comments. So that you look at it from both sides, not just one. If you want to worship someone, go and find Jesus. Mylow though is a normal mortal subject to scrutiny.

[bhaas]

This thread is a perpetual motion machine!

More like a Perpetual Bullshit Machine.

Good thing I got my Cyber Boots on.

Brad

[dankie]

Perpetual motion doesnt mean it has the power to run anything ,  add an alternator you'll see how pathetic this mahine is .

Useless machine .

[i_ron]

@AnandAadhar


and let me tell you, things are gonna change. Stay tuned.

wattsup, watt do you know that you are not telling us?

Watt is the url of the builders group for this, please, I haven't found it.

Ron

[gyulasun]

Watt is the url of the builders group for this, please, I haven't found it.

Ron

Hi Ron,

I think this thread is here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7162.0

rgds,  Gyula